Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq
Škoda Peaq leads 6 to 2
Biggest differences: Boot — Škoda Enyaq 585 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 165 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Battery — Škoda Enyaq 77 kWh, Škoda Peaq 86 kWh.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available with RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 581 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq
Škoda Enyaq or Škoda Peaq — who wins where
Škoda Peaq leads 6 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Peaq +66 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Peaq +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Enyaq −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWŠkoda Peaq +34 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minŠkoda Peaq −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq −168 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +350 l
Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Škoda Enyaq85 | Škoda Peaq 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 581 km | 647 km | Škoda +66 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 86 kWh | Škoda +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 199 kW | Škoda +34 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 28 min | Škoda −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | 16.2 km/min | Škoda +2.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 286 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.1 s | Škoda −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2066 kg | 2234 kg | Škoda −168 kg |
| Boot | 585 l | 935 l | Škoda +350 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4658 mm | 4874 mm | Škoda +216 mm |
| Width | 1879 mm | 1867 mm | Škoda +12 mm |
| Height | 1622 mm | 1664 mm | Škoda +42 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2965 mm | Škoda +199 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Enyaq
Škoda Peaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Enyaq
Škoda Peaq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Enyaq or Škoda Peaq?
The Škoda Peaq goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Škoda Enyaq. That is a difference of 66 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 585 l in the Škoda Enyaq. The difference is 350 l.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Enyaq accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.