Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq

Biggest differences: Boot — Škoda Enyaq 585 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 135 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Battery — Škoda Enyaq 77 kWh, Škoda Peaq 86 kWh.

Škoda Enyaq

The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Enyaq or Škoda Peaq — who wins where

Škoda Peaq leads 4 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Peaq +66 km
    Škoda Enyaq
    581
    Škoda Peaq
    647
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Peaq +9 kWh
    Škoda Enyaq
    77
    Škoda Peaq
    86
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −0.1 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Enyaq
    14.9
    Škoda Peaq
    15
  • Power PSNo difference
    Škoda Enyaq
    286
    Škoda Peaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Enyaq −0.4 s
    Škoda Enyaq
    6.7
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Enyaq
    180
    Škoda Peaq
    180
  • DC charging kWŠkoda Peaq +64 kW
    Škoda Enyaq
    135
    Škoda Peaq
    199
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Enyaq
    11
    Škoda Peaq
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Škoda Enyaq
    28
    Škoda Peaq
    28
  • Weight kgŠkoda Enyaq −168 kg
    Škoda Enyaq
    2066
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +350 l
    Škoda Enyaq
    585
    Škoda Peaq
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Škoda Peaq
Key parameters Škoda Enyaq
85
Škoda Peaq
90
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range581 km647 kmŠkoda +66 km
Battery77 kWh86 kWhŠkoda +9 kWh
Consumption14.9 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging135 kW199 kWŠkoda +64 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min28 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging14.5 km/min16.2 km/minŠkoda +1.7 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS286 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h6.7 s7.1 sŠkoda −0.4 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight2066 kg2234 kgŠkoda −168 kg
Boot585 l935 lŠkoda +350 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Škoda
Length4658 mm4874 mmŠkoda +216 mm
Width1879 mm1867 mmŠkoda +12 mm
Height1622 mm1664 mmŠkoda +42 mm
Wheelbase2766 mm2965 mmŠkoda +199 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Enyaq

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Enyaq

Škoda Peaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Enyaq or Škoda Peaq?

The Škoda Peaq goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Škoda Enyaq. That is a difference of 66 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Škoda Peaq — its 86 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Enyaq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 585 l in the Škoda Enyaq. The difference is 350 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Enyaq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.