Audi Q6 e-tron vs Škoda Peaq

Audi Q6 e-tron leads 8 to 2

Biggest differences: Boot — Audi Q6 e-tron 526 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · DC charging — Audi Q6 e-tron 270 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Charging 10–80% — Audi Q6 e-tron 21 min, Škoda Peaq 28 min.

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering four powertrain variants with different power and range.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Škoda Peaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q6 e-tron or Škoda Peaq — who wins where

Audi Q6 e-tron leads 8 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmAudi Q6 e-tron +14 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    661
    Škoda Peaq
    647
  • Battery kWhAudi Q6 e-tron +8.9 kWh
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    94.9
    Škoda Peaq
    86
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −0.9 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    15.9
    Škoda Peaq
    15
  • Power PSAudi Q6 e-tron +20 PS
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    306
    Škoda Peaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sAudi Q6 e-tron −0.5 s
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    6.6
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hAudi Q6 e-tron +30 km/h
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    210
    Škoda Peaq
    180
  • DC charging kWAudi Q6 e-tron +71 kW
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    270
    Škoda Peaq
    199
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    11
    Škoda Peaq
    11
  • Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 e-tron −7 min
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    21
    Škoda Peaq
    28
  • Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 e-tron −34 kg
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    2200
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +409 l
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    526
    Škoda Peaq
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Škoda Peaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Škoda Peaq
Key parameters Audi Q6 e-tron
performance
Škoda Peaq
90
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range661 km647 kmAudi +14 km
Battery94.9 kWh86 kWhAudi +8.9 kWh
Consumption ↓15.9 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging270 kW199 kWAudi +71 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓21 min28 minAudi −7 min
Range per minute of charging22 km/min16.2 km/minAudi +5.8 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VAudi +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power306 PS286 PSAudi +20 PS
0–100 km/h ↓6.6 s7.1 sAudi −0.5 s
Top speed210 km/h180 km/hAudi +30 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2200 kg2234 kgAudi −34 kg
Boot526 l935 lŠkoda +409 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Škoda
Length4771 mm4874 mmŠkoda +103 mm
Width1939 mm1867 mmAudi +72 mm
Height1648 mm1664 mmŠkoda +16 mm
Wheelbase2893 mm2965 mmŠkoda +72 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q6 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q6 e-tron

Škoda Peaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 e-tron or Škoda Peaq?

The Audi Q6 e-tron goes further: 661 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 14 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Škoda Peaq — its 86 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 526 l in the Audi Q6 e-tron. The difference is 409 l.

Which charges faster?

The Audi Q6 e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Škoda Peaq up to 199 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.