BMW iX4 vs Škoda Peaq

BMW iX4 leads 7 to 3

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX4 400 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · Boot — BMW iX4 490 l, Škoda Peaq 935 l · Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Škoda Peaq 286 PS.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Peaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX4 or Škoda Peaq — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +181 km
    BMW iX4
    828
    Škoda Peaq
    647
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +22.7 kWh
    BMW iX4
    108.7
    Škoda Peaq
    86
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −0.7 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX4
    15.7
    Škoda Peaq
    15
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +183 PS
    BMW iX4
    469
    Škoda Peaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX4 −2.2 s
    BMW iX4
    4.9
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +30 km/h
    BMW iX4
    210
    Škoda Peaq
    180
  • DC charging kWBMW iX4 +201 kW
    BMW iX4
    400
    Škoda Peaq
    199
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX4
    11
    Škoda Peaq
    11
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX4 −7 min
    BMW iX4
    21
    Škoda Peaq
    28
  • Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −71 kg
    BMW iX4
    2305
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +445 l
    BMW iX4
    490
    Škoda Peaq
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Peaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Peaq
Key parameters BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Škoda Peaq
90
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range828 km647 kmBMW +181 km
Battery108.7 kWh86 kWhBMW +22.7 kWh
Consumption ↓15.7 kWh/100 km15 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW199 kWBMW +201 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓21 min28 minBMW −7 min
Range per minute of charging27.6 km/min16.2 km/minBMW +11.4 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS286 PSBMW +183 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s7.1 sBMW −2.2 s
Top speed210 km/h180 km/hBMW +30 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2305 kg2234 kgŠkoda −71 kg
Boot490 l935 lŠkoda +445 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4874 mmŠkoda +92 mm
Width1895 mm1867 mmBMW +28 mm
Height1595 mm1664 mmŠkoda +69 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2965 mmŠkoda +68 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX4

Škoda Peaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Škoda Peaq?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 181 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Škoda Peaq differ?

The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Škoda Peaq?

The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 183 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 490 l in the BMW iX4. The difference is 445 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.