Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Volvo EX60 leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Škoda Peaq 286 PS, Volvo EX60 680 PS · DC charging — Škoda Peaq 199 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW · 0–100 km/h — Škoda Peaq 7.1 s, Volvo EX60 3.9 s.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 611 to 810 km, power ranging from 374 to 680 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 400 kW.
Profile against the market: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Škoda Peaq90
Volvo EX60P12 AWD
Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 6 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +163 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +31 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +394 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −3.2 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +201 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −9 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −122 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +412 l
Technical data: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Peaq90 | Volvo EX60P12 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 647 km | 810 km | Volvo +163 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 117 kWh | Volvo +31 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 199 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +201 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 19 min | Volvo −9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.2 km/min | 29.8 km/min | Volvo +13.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +394 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 3.9 s | Volvo −3.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2234 kg | 2356 kg | Škoda −122 kg |
| Boot | 935 l | 523 l | Škoda +412 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4874 mm | 4803 mm | Škoda +71 mm |
| Width | 1867 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +41 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1635 mm | Škoda +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 goes further: 810 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 163 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Peaq and the Volvo EX60 differ?
The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 680 PS.
Which is more powerful — Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 680 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 394 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 523 l in the Volvo EX60. The difference is 412 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.



