Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60

Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Peaq 199 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW · AC charging — Škoda Peaq 11 kW, Volvo EX60 22 kW · Boot — Škoda Peaq 935 l, Volvo EX60 523 l.

Škoda Peaq

The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.

Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60 — who wins where

Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +13 km
    Škoda Peaq
    647
    Volvo EX60
    660
  • Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +9 kWh
    Škoda Peaq
    86
    Volvo EX60
    95
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −1.2 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Peaq
    15
    Volvo EX60
    16.2
  • Power PSVolvo EX60 +224 PS
    Škoda Peaq
    286
    Volvo EX60
    510
  • 0–100 km/h sVolvo EX60 −2.5 s
    Škoda Peaq
    7.1
    Volvo EX60
    4.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Peaq
    180
    Volvo EX60
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +201 kW
    Škoda Peaq
    199
    Volvo EX60
    400
  • AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
    Škoda Peaq
    11
    Volvo EX60
    22
  • Charging minVolvo EX60 −12 min
    Škoda Peaq
    28
    Volvo EX60
    16
  • Weight kgŠkoda Peaq −41 kg
    Škoda Peaq
    2234
    Volvo EX60
    2275
  • Boot lŠkoda Peaq +412 l
    Škoda Peaq
    935
    Volvo EX60
    523

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Key parameters Škoda Peaq
90
Volvo EX60
P10 AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range647 km660 kmVolvo +13 km
Battery86 kWh95 kWhVolvo +9 kWh
Consumption15 kWh/100 km16.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging199 kW400 kWVolvo +201 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWVolvo +11 kW
Charging 10–80%28 min16 minVolvo −12 min
Range per minute of charging16.2 km/min28.9 km/minVolvo +12.7 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VVolvo +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS510 PSVolvo +224 PS
0–100 km/h7.1 s4.6 sVolvo −2.5 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2234 kg2275 kgŠkoda −41 kg
Boot935 l523 lŠkoda +412 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4874 mm4803 mmŠkoda +71 mm
Width1867 mm1908 mmVolvo +41 mm
Height1664 mm1635 mmŠkoda +29 mm
Wheelbase2965 mm2970 mmVolvo +5 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Peaq

Cost per 100 km4.5
Monthly56
Yearly675

Volvo EX60

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Peaq

Volvo EX60

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Peaq and the Volvo EX60 differ?

The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 510 PS.

Which is more powerful — Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60?

The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 510 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 224 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 523 l in the Volvo EX60. The difference is 412 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Peaq accepts up to 199 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 16 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.