Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Peaq 199 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW · AC charging — Škoda Peaq 11 kW, Volvo EX60 22 kW · Boot — Škoda Peaq 935 l, Volvo EX60 523 l.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Škoda Peaq90
Volvo EX60P10 AWD
Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +13 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Peaq −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +224 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −2.5 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +201 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −12 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −41 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +412 l
Technical data: Škoda Peaq vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Peaq90 | Volvo EX60P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 647 km | 660 km | Volvo +13 km |
| Battery | 86 kWh | 95 kWh | Volvo +9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 199 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +201 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 16 min | Volvo −12 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.2 km/min | 28.9 km/min | Volvo +12.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +224 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.1 s | 4.6 s | Volvo −2.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2234 kg | 2275 kg | Škoda −41 kg |
| Boot | 935 l | 523 l | Škoda +412 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4874 mm | 4803 mm | Škoda +71 mm |
| Width | 1867 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +41 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1635 mm | Škoda +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +5 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Peaq
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Peaq and the Volvo EX60 differ?
The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Volvo EX60 has AWD and 510 PS.
Which is more powerful — Škoda Peaq or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 510 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 224 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Peaq takes more: 935 l against 523 l in the Volvo EX60. The difference is 412 l.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Peaq accepts up to 199 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 16 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.

