BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW iX3 11 kW, Volvo EX60 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX3 21 min, Volvo EX60 16 min · WLTP range — BMW iX3 805 km, Volvo EX60 660 km.
BMW iX3
The BMW iX3 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two drive variants with a range of up to 805 km according to the WLTP cycle.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two different powertrain options with varying power outputs and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
BMW iX350 xDrive
Volvo EX60P10 AWD
BMW iX3 or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX3 +145 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX3 +13.7 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −0.3 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX3 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWVolvo EX60 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −5 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX60 −10 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 +3 l
Technical data: BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX3 50 xDrive | Volvo EX60 P10 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 805 km | 660 km | BMW +145 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 95 kWh | BMW +13.7 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 400 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Volvo +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 16 min | Volvo −5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 26.8 km/min | 28.9 km/min | Volvo +2.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 469 PS | 510 PS | Volvo +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | Volvo −0.3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2285 kg | 2275 kg | Volvo −10 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 523 l | Volvo +3 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4782 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +21 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +13 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1635 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 2897 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX3 or Volvo EX60?
The BMW iX3 goes further: 805 km WLTP against the 660 km of the Volvo EX60. That is a difference of 145 km.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX3 accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 16 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BMW iX3 uses less electricity: 15.1 kWh/100 km against 16.2 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX60. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.