BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
Volvo EX60 leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX3 469 PS, Volvo EX60 680 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX3 4.9 s, Volvo EX60 3.9 s · Top speed — BMW iX3 210 km/h, Volvo EX60 180 km/h.
BMW iX3
BMW iX3 is a D-segment SUV in two variants: WLTP range from 637 to 805 km, power from 320 to 469 hp.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 611 to 810 km, power ranging from 374 to 680 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 400 kW.
Profile against the market: BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
BMW iX350 xDrive
Volvo EX60P12 AWD
BMW iX3 or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 6 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +5 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +8.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +211 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −1 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX3 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX3 −71 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 +3 l
Technical data: BMW iX3 vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX3 50 xDrive | Volvo EX60 P12 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 805 km | 810 km | Volvo +5 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 117 kWh | Volvo +8.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.1 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | BMW −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 400 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 19 min | Volvo −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 26.8 km/min | 29.8 km/min | Volvo +3 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 469 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +211 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 3.9 s | Volvo −1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2285 kg | 2356 kg | BMW −71 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 523 l | Volvo +3 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4782 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +21 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +13 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1635 mm | No difference |
| Wheelbase | 2897 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX3
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which is more powerful — BMW iX3 or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 680 PS against the 469 PS of the BMW iX3. The gap is 211 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX3 accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 19 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The BMW iX3 uses less electricity: 15.1 kWh/100 km against 16.1 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX60. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.