Audi Q6 e-tron vs BMW iX3

Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 e-tron 306 PS, BMW iX3 469 PS · DC charging — Audi Q6 e-tron 270 kW, BMW iX3 400 kW · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 e-tron 6.6 s, BMW iX3 4.9 s.

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering four powertrain variants with different power and range.

BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering two drive variants with a range of up to 805 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: Audi Q6 e-tron vs BMW iX3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Audi Q6 e-tron or BMW iX3 — who wins where

BMW iX3 leads 6 to 2

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX3 +144 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    661
    BMW iX3
    805
  • Battery kWhBMW iX3 +13.8 kWh
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    94.9
    BMW iX3
    108.7
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −0.8 kWh/100 km
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    15.9
    BMW iX3
    15.1
  • Power PSBMW iX3 +163 PS
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    306
    BMW iX3
    469
  • 0–100 km/h sBMW iX3 −1.7 s
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    6.6
    BMW iX3
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    210
    BMW iX3
    210
  • DC charging kWBMW iX3 +130 kW
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    270
    BMW iX3
    400
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    11
    BMW iX3
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    21
    BMW iX3
    21
  • Weight kgAudi Q6 e-tron −85 kg
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    2200
    BMW iX3
    2285
  • Boot lAudi Q6 e-tron +6 l
    Audi Q6 e-tron
    526
    BMW iX3
    520

Add a third car

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs BMW iX3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs BMW iX3
Key parameters Audi Q6 e-tron
performance
BMW iX3
50 xDrive
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range661 km805 kmBMW +144 km
Battery94.9 kWh108.7 kWhBMW +13.8 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km15.1 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging270 kW400 kWBMW +130 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%21 min21 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging22 km/min26.8 km/minBMW +4.8 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power306 PS469 PSBMW +163 PS
0–100 km/h6.6 s4.9 sBMW −1.7 s
Top speed210 km/h210 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2200 kg2285 kgAudi −85 kg
Boot526 l520 lAudi +6 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly BMW
Length4771 mm4782 mmBMW +11 mm
Width1939 mm1895 mmAudi +44 mm
Height1648 mm1635 mmAudi +13 mm
Wheelbase2893 mm2897 mmBMW +4 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Audi Q6 e-tron

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

BMW iX3

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Audi Q6 e-tron

BMW iX3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 e-tron or BMW iX3?

The BMW iX3 goes further: 805 km WLTP against the 661 km of the Audi Q6 e-tron. That is a difference of 144 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 e-tron and the BMW iX3 differ?

The Audi Q6 e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The BMW iX3 has AWD and 469 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BMW iX3 — its 108.7 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Audi Q6 e-tron, with 94.9 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 e-tron or BMW iX3?

The BMW iX3 is stronger: 469 PS against the 306 PS of the Audi Q6 e-tron. The gap is 163 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.