Audi Q6 e-tron vs Porsche Macan
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 e-tron 306 PS, Porsche Macan 360 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 e-tron 6.6 s, Porsche Macan 5.7 s · Consumption — Audi Q6 e-tron 15.9 kWh/100 km, Porsche Macan 17 kWh/100 km.
Audi Q6 e-tron
The Audi Q6 e-tron is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering four powertrain variants with different power and range.
Porsche Macan
The electric SUV, belonging to the D segment, is offered in five different powertrain configurations, with power ranging from 360 horsepower to 639 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Porsche Macan
Audi Q6 e-tronperformance- Porsche MacanMacan
Audi Q6 e-tron or Porsche Macan — who wins where
Porsche Macan leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmAudi Q6 e-tron +20 km
- Battery kWhPorsche Macan +0.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmAudi Q6 e-tron −1.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPorsche Macan +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sPorsche Macan −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hPorsche Macan +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 e-tron −20 kg
- Boot lPorsche Macan +14 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Porsche Macan
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 e-tron performance | Porsche Macan Macan | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 661 km | 641 km | Audi +20 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 95 kWh | Porsche +0.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km | Audi −1.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 270 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 21 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 22 km/min | 21.4 km/min | Audi +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 360 PS | Porsche +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 5.7 s | Porsche −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 220 km/h | Porsche +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2220 kg | Audi −20 kg |
| Boot | 526 l | 540 l | Porsche +14 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4784 mm | Porsche +13 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1938 mm | Audi +1 mm |
| Height | 1648 mm | 1623 mm | Audi +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2893 mm | No difference |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 e-tron
Porsche Macan
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 e-tron
Porsche Macan
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 e-tron or Porsche Macan?
The Audi Q6 e-tron goes further: 661 km WLTP against the 641 km of the Porsche Macan. That is a difference of 20 km.
Why does the Porsche Macan have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Audi Q6 e-tron?
The Porsche Macan carries 95 kWh and covers 641 km, while the Audi Q6 e-tron with its 94.9 kWh battery does 661 km. Energy use decides it: 17 against 15.9 kWh/100 km.
Which charges faster?
The Audi Q6 e-tron accepts up to 270 kW DC, the Porsche Macan up to 270 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 21 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Audi Q6 e-tron uses less electricity: 15.9 kWh/100 km against 17 kWh/100 km in the Porsche Macan. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 165 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.