BMW iX3 vs BMW iX4

BMW iX3 leads 3 to 1

Biggest differences: Boot — BMW iX3 520 l, BMW iX4 490 l · Consumption — BMW iX3 15.1 kWh/100 km, BMW iX4 15.7 kWh/100 km · WLTP range — BMW iX3 805 km, BMW iX4 828 km.

BMW iX3

BMW iX3 is a D-segment SUV in two variants: WLTP range from 637 to 805 km, power from 320 to 469 hp.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Profile against the market: BMW iX3 vs BMW iX4

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX3 or BMW iX4 — who wins where

BMW iX3 leads 3 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +23 km
    BMW iX3
    805
    BMW iX4
    828
  • Battery kWhNo difference
    BMW iX3
    108.7
    BMW iX4
    108.7
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX3 −0.6 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX3
    15.1
    BMW iX4
    15.7
  • Power PSNo difference
    BMW iX3
    469
    BMW iX4
    469
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    BMW iX3
    4.9
    BMW iX4
    4.9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    BMW iX3
    210
    BMW iX4
    210
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX3
    400
    BMW iX4
    400
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX3
    11
    BMW iX4
    11
  • Charging ↓ minNo difference
    BMW iX3
    21
    BMW iX4
    21
  • Weight ↓ kgBMW iX3 −20 kg
    BMW iX3
    2285
    BMW iX4
    2305
  • Boot lBMW iX3 +30 l
    BMW iX3
    520
    BMW iX4
    490

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX3 vs BMW iX4

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX3 vs BMW iX4
Key parameters BMW iX3
50 xDrive
BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range805 km828 kmBMW +23 km
Battery108.7 kWh108.7 kWhNo difference
Consumption ↓15.1 kWh/100 km15.7 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW400 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓21 min21 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging26.8 km/min27.6 km/minBMW +0.8 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS469 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s4.9 sNo difference
Top speed210 km/h210 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2285 kg2305 kgBMW −20 kg
Boot520 l490 lBMW +30 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4782 mmNo difference
Width1895 mm1895 mmNo difference
Height1635 mm1595 mmBMW +40 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2897 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX3

Cost per 100 km4.53
Monthly57
Yearly679

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX3

BMW iX4

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX3 or BMW iX4?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 805 km of the BMW iX3. That is a difference of 23 km.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX3 accepts up to 400 kW DC, the BMW iX4 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 21 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The BMW iX3 uses less electricity: 15.1 kWh/100 km against 15.7 kWh/100 km in the BMW iX4. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 90 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.