BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60
Volvo EX60 leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Volvo EX60 680 PS · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX4 4.9 s, Volvo EX60 3.9 s · Top speed — BMW iX4 210 km/h, Volvo EX60 180 km/h.
BMW iX4
The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 611 to 810 km, power ranging from 374 to 680 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 400 kW.
Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60
BMW iX450 xDrive
Volvo EX60P12 AWD
BMW iX4 or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 5 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +18 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +8.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +211 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −1 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +30 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX4 −51 kg
- Boot lVolvo EX60 +33 l
Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX4 50 xDrive | Volvo EX60 P12 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 828 km | 810 km | BMW +18 km |
| Battery | 108.7 kWh | 117 kWh | Volvo +8.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | BMW −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 400 kW | 400 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 19 min | Volvo −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 27.6 km/min | 29.8 km/min | Volvo +2.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 469 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +211 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.9 s | 3.9 s | Volvo −1 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2305 kg | 2356 kg | BMW −51 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 523 l | Volvo +33 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4782 mm | 4803 mm | Volvo +21 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1908 mm | Volvo +13 mm |
| Height | 1595 mm | 1635 mm | Volvo +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2897 mm | 2970 mm | Volvo +73 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX4
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Volvo EX60?
The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 810 km of the Volvo EX60. That is a difference of 18 km.
Why does the Volvo EX60 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX4?
The Volvo EX60 carries 117 kWh and covers 810 km, while the BMW iX4 with its 108.7 kWh battery does 828 km. Energy use decides it: 16.1 against 15.7 kWh/100 km.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 680 PS against the 469 PS of the BMW iX4. The gap is 211 PS.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX4 accepts up to 400 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 21 and 19 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.