Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60
Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes GLC 490 PS, Volvo EX60 680 PS · Battery — Mercedes GLC 94 kWh, Volvo EX60 117 kWh · DC charging — Mercedes GLC 330 kW, Volvo EX60 400 kW.
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.
Volvo EX60
The Volvo EX60 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 611 to 810 km, power ranging from 374 to 680 horsepower, and DC fast charging up to 400 kW.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60
Mercedes GLCGLC 400 4MATIC
Volvo EX60P12 AWD
Mercedes GLC or Volvo EX60 — who wins where
Volvo EX60 leads 7 to 3
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX60 +95 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX60 +23 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −1.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX60 +190 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX60 −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLC +30 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX60 +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo data
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX60 −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX60 −104 kg
- Boot lMercedes GLC +47 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes GLC GLC 400 4MATIC | Volvo EX60 P12 AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 715 km | 810 km | Volvo +95 km |
| Battery | 94 kWh | 117 kWh | Volvo +23 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 16.1 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −1.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 330 kW | 400 kW | Volvo +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | — | — |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 19 min | Volvo −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22.7 km/min | 29.8 km/min | Volvo +7.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 490 PS | 680 PS | Volvo +190 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.3 s | 3.9 s | Volvo −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2460 kg | 2356 kg | Volvo −104 kg |
| Boot | 570 l | 523 l | Mercedes +47 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4845 mm | 4803 mm | Mercedes +42 mm |
| Width | 1913 mm | 1908 mm | Mercedes +5 mm |
| Height | 1644 mm | 1635 mm | Mercedes +9 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2972 mm | 2970 mm | Mercedes +2 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLC
Volvo EX60
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLC or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 goes further: 810 km WLTP against the 715 km of the Mercedes GLC. That is a difference of 95 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX60 — its 117 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLC, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Mercedes GLC or Volvo EX60?
The Volvo EX60 is stronger: 680 PS against the 490 PS of the Mercedes GLC. The gap is 190 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Mercedes GLC accepts up to 330 kW DC, the Volvo EX60 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 22 and 19 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.