Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mercedes GLC
Biggest differences: Power — Audi Q6 e-tron 306 PS, Mercedes GLC 490 PS · 0–100 km/h — Audi Q6 e-tron 6.6 s, Mercedes GLC 4.3 s · DC charging — Audi Q6 e-tron 270 kW, Mercedes GLC 330 kW.
Audi Q6 e-tron
The Audi Q6 e-tron is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering four powertrain variants with different power and range.
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.
Profile against the market: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mercedes GLC
Audi Q6 e-tronperformance
Mercedes GLCGLC 400 4MATIC
Audi Q6 e-tron or Mercedes GLC — who wins where
Mercedes GLC leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLC +54 km
- Battery kWhAudi Q6 e-tron +0.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLC +184 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLC −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWMercedes GLC +60 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minAudi Q6 e-tron −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgAudi Q6 e-tron −260 kg
- Boot lMercedes GLC +44 l
Technical data: Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mercedes GLC
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Audi Q6 e-tron performance | Mercedes GLC GLC 400 4MATIC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 661 km | 715 km | Mercedes +54 km |
| Battery | 94.9 kWh | 94 kWh | Audi +0.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 14.9 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 270 kW | 330 kW | Mercedes +60 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 21 min | 22 min | Audi −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22 km/min | 22.7 km/min | Mercedes +0.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 306 PS | 490 PS | Mercedes +184 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 4.3 s | Mercedes −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 210 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2200 kg | 2460 kg | Audi −260 kg |
| Boot | 526 l | 570 l | Mercedes +44 l |
| Length | 4771 mm | 4845 mm | Mercedes +74 mm |
| Width | 1939 mm | 1913 mm | Audi +26 mm |
| Height | 1648 mm | 1644 mm | Audi +4 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2893 mm | 2972 mm | Mercedes +79 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Audi Q6 e-tron or Mercedes GLC?
The Mercedes GLC goes further: 715 km WLTP against the 661 km of the Audi Q6 e-tron. That is a difference of 54 km.
Why does the Audi Q6 e-tron have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Mercedes GLC?
The Audi Q6 e-tron carries 94.9 kWh and covers 661 km, while the Mercedes GLC with its 94 kWh battery does 715 km. Energy use decides it: 15.9 against 14.9 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC differ?
The Audi Q6 e-tron has RWD and 306 PS. The Mercedes GLC has AWD and 490 PS.
Which is more powerful — Audi Q6 e-tron or Mercedes GLC?
The Mercedes GLC is stronger: 490 PS against the 306 PS of the Audi Q6 e-tron. The gap is 184 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.