Mercedes GLC vs Škoda Peaq
Mercedes GLC leads 8 to 2
Biggest differences: Power — Mercedes GLC 490 PS, Škoda Peaq 286 PS · DC charging — Mercedes GLC 330 kW, Škoda Peaq 199 kW · 0–100 km/h — Mercedes GLC 4.3 s, Škoda Peaq 7.1 s.
Mercedes GLC
The Mercedes GLC is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, offering both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, as well as a long driving range.
Škoda Peaq
The Škoda Peaq is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three drive variants with ranges reaching up to 647 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Mercedes GLC vs Škoda Peaq
Mercedes GLCGLC 400 4MATIC
Škoda Peaq90
Mercedes GLC or Škoda Peaq — who wins where
Mercedes GLC leads 8 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmMercedes GLC +68 km
- Battery kWhMercedes GLC +8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMercedes GLC −0.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMercedes GLC +204 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMercedes GLC −2.8 s
- Top speed km/hMercedes GLC +30 km/h
- DC charging kWMercedes GLC +131 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minMercedes GLC −6 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Peaq −226 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Peaq +365 l
Technical data: Mercedes GLC vs Škoda Peaq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Mercedes GLC GLC 400 4MATIC | Škoda Peaq 90 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 715 km | 647 km | Mercedes +68 km |
| Battery | 94 kWh | 86 kWh | Mercedes +8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km | Mercedes −0.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 330 kW | 199 kW | Mercedes +131 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 22 min | 28 min | Mercedes −6 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 22.7 km/min | 16.2 km/min | Mercedes +6.5 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | Mercedes +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 490 PS | 286 PS | Mercedes +204 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.3 s | 7.1 s | Mercedes −2.8 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h | Mercedes +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2460 kg | 2234 kg | Škoda −226 kg |
| Boot | 570 l | 935 l | Škoda +365 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | 4845 mm | 4874 mm | Škoda +29 mm |
| Width | 1913 mm | 1867 mm | Mercedes +46 mm |
| Height | 1644 mm | 1664 mm | Škoda +20 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2972 mm | 2965 mm | Mercedes +7 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Mercedes GLC
Škoda Peaq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Mercedes GLC
Škoda Peaq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Mercedes GLC or Škoda Peaq?
The Mercedes GLC goes further: 715 km WLTP against the 647 km of the Škoda Peaq. That is a difference of 68 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Mercedes GLC and the Škoda Peaq differ?
The Mercedes GLC has AWD and 490 PS. The Škoda Peaq has RWD and 286 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Peaq — its 86 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Mercedes GLC, with 94 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Mercedes GLC or Škoda Peaq?
The Mercedes GLC is stronger: 490 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Peaq. The gap is 204 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.