BMW iX4 vs Elaris BEO

BMW iX4 leads 6 to 0

Biggest differences: Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Elaris BEO 204 PS · WLTP range — BMW iX4 828 km, Elaris BEO 489 km · Top speed — BMW iX4 210 km/h, Elaris BEO 150 km/h.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Elaris BEO

Elaris BEO is a D-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in two variants with 204 hp: WLTP range from 456 to 489 km.

Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Elaris BEO

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX4 or Elaris BEO — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 6 to 0

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +339 km
    BMW iX4
    828
    Elaris BEO
    489
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +22.7 kWh
    BMW iX4
    108.7
    Elaris BEO
    86
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX4 −1.9 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX4
    15.7
    Elaris BEO
    17.6
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +265 PS
    BMW iX4
    469
    Elaris BEO
    204
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo data
    BMW iX4
    4.9
    Elaris BEO
    —
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +60 km/h
    BMW iX4
    210
    Elaris BEO
    150
  • DC charging kWNo data
    BMW iX4
    400
    Elaris BEO
    —
  • AC charging kWNo data
    BMW iX4
    11
    Elaris BEO
    —
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BMW iX4
    2305
    Elaris BEO
    —
  • Boot lBMW iX4 +23 l
    BMW iX4
    490
    Elaris BEO
    467

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Elaris BEO

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Elaris BEO
Key parameters BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Elaris BEO
Innovationspaket
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range828 km489 kmBMW +339 km
Battery108.7 kWh86 kWhBMW +22.7 kWh
Consumption ↓15.7 kWh/100 km17.6 kWh/100 kmBMW −1.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW——
AC charging11 kW——
Charging ⚠21 min 10–80%45 min 20–80%24 min
Range per minute of charging27.6 km/min6.5 km/minBMW +21.1 km/min
Voltage800 V——
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS204 PSBMW +265 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s——
Top speed210 km/h150 km/hBMW +60 km/h
DrivetrainAWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2305 kg——
Boot490 l467 lBMW +23 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BMW
Length4782 mm——
Width1895 mm——
Height1595 mm——
Wheelbase2897 mm——

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.28
Monthly66
Yearly792

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX4

Elaris BEO

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Elaris BEO?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 339 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Elaris BEO differ?

The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BMW iX4 — its 108.7 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Elaris BEO?

The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 204 PS of the Elaris BEO. The gap is 265 PS.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.