Elaris BEO vs Xpeng G6

Biggest differences: DC charging — Elaris BEO 100 kW, Xpeng G6 451 kW · Power — Elaris BEO 204 PS, Xpeng G6 296 PS · Top speed — Elaris BEO 150 km/h, Xpeng G6 202 km/h.

Elaris BEO

The Elaris BEO is an SUV in the D segment, offering front-wheel drive and a WLTP range of 489 km.

Xpeng G6

The Xpeng G6 is a crossover (segment D) that offers three different powertrain options and supports fast DC charging up to 451 kW.

Profile against the market: Elaris BEO vs Xpeng G6

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Elaris BEO or Xpeng G6 — who wins where

Xpeng G6 leads 6 to 2

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng G6 +36 km
    Elaris BEO
    489
    Xpeng G6
    525
  • Battery kWhElaris BEO +6 kWh
    Elaris BEO
    86
    Xpeng G6
    80
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmXpeng G6 −1.8 kWh/100 km
    Elaris BEO
    19.3
    Xpeng G6
    17.5
  • Power PSXpeng G6 +92 PS
    Elaris BEO
    204
    Xpeng G6
    296
  • 0–100 km/h sNo data
    Elaris BEO
    Xpeng G6
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hXpeng G6 +52 km/h
    Elaris BEO
    150
    Xpeng G6
    202
  • DC charging kWXpeng G6 +351 kW
    Elaris BEO
    100
    Xpeng G6
    451
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Elaris BEO
    11
    Xpeng G6
    11
  • Weight kgElaris BEO −160 kg
    Elaris BEO
    1955
    Xpeng G6
    2115
  • Boot lXpeng G6 +104 l
    Elaris BEO
    467
    Xpeng G6
    571

Add a third car

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Xpeng G6

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Elaris BEO vs Xpeng G6
Key parameters Elaris BEO
Standard
Xpeng G6
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range489 km525 kmXpeng +36 km
Battery86 kWh80 kWhElaris +6 kWh
Consumption19.3 kWh/100 km17.5 kWh/100 kmXpeng −1.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging100 kW451 kWXpeng +351 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 45 min 20–80%12 min 10–80%33 min
Range per minute of charging6.5 km/min30.6 km/minXpeng +24.1 km/min
Voltage800 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS296 PSXpeng +92 PS
0–100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed150 km/h202 km/hXpeng +52 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1955 kg2115 kgElaris −160 kg
Boot467 l571 lXpeng +104 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Xpeng
Length4698 mm4758 mmXpeng +60 mm
Width1908 mm1920 mmXpeng +12 mm
Height1696 mm1650 mmElaris +46 mm
Wheelbase2800 mm2890 mmXpeng +90 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Elaris BEO

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Xpeng G6

Cost per 100 km5.25
Monthly66
Yearly788

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Elaris BEO

Xpeng G6

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Elaris BEO or Xpeng G6?

The Xpeng G6 goes further: 525 km WLTP against the 489 km of the Elaris BEO. That is a difference of 36 km.

Why does the Elaris BEO have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng G6?

The Elaris BEO carries 86 kWh and covers 489 km, while the Xpeng G6 with its 80 kWh battery does 525 km. Energy use decides it: 19.3 against 17.5 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Elaris BEO and the Xpeng G6 differ?

The Elaris BEO has FWD and 204 PS. The Xpeng G6 has RWD and 296 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Xpeng G6 — its 80 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Elaris BEO, with 86 kWh, does not offer it.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.