Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Smart #5 leads 9 to 2
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 165 kW, Smart #5 400 kW · AC charging — Škoda Enyaq 11 kW, Smart #5 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Škoda Enyaq 29 min, Smart #5 18 min.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available with RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 581 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Smart #5
Smart #5 is a D-segment SUV offering four drivetrain variants with power ranging from 340 hp to 646 hp.
Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Škoda Enyaq85
Smart #5Pro+
Škoda Enyaq or Smart #5 — who wins where
Smart #5 leads 9 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSmart #5 +9 km
- Battery kWhSmart #5 +17 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −3.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSmart #5 +77 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSmart #5 −0.1 s
- Top speed km/hSmart #5 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWSmart #5 +235 kW
- AC charging kWSmart #5 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minSmart #5 −11 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq −194 kg
- Boot lSmart #5 +45 l
Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Enyaq 85 | Smart #5 Pro+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 581 km | 590 km | Smart +9 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 94 kWh | Smart +17 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 18.4 kWh/100 km | Škoda −3.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 400 kW | Smart +235 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Smart +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 18 min | Smart −11 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | 22.9 km/min | Smart +8.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Smart +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 363 PS | Smart +77 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.5 s | Smart −0.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h | Smart +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2066 kg | 2260 kg | Škoda −194 kg |
| Boot | 585 l | 630 l | Smart +45 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4658 mm | 4695 mm | Smart +37 mm |
| Width | 1879 mm | 1920 mm | Smart +41 mm |
| Height | 1622 mm | 1705 mm | Smart +83 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2900 mm | Smart +134 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Enyaq
Smart #5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Enyaq
Smart #5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Enyaq accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Smart #5 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 18 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Enyaq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 18.4 kWh/100 km in the Smart #5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 480 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.