Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 135 kW, Smart #5 400 kW · AC charging — Škoda Enyaq 11 kW, Smart #5 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Škoda Enyaq 28 min, Smart #5 18 min.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.
Smart #5
Smart #5 is a D-segment SUV offering four drivetrain variants with power ranging from 340 hp to 646 hp.
Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Škoda Enyaq85
Smart #5Pro+
Škoda Enyaq or Smart #5 — who wins where
Smart #5 leads 9 to 2
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmSmart #5 +9 km
- Battery kWhSmart #5 +17 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −3.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSSmart #5 +77 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sSmart #5 −0.2 s
- Top speed km/hSmart #5 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWSmart #5 +265 kW
- AC charging kWSmart #5 +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minSmart #5 −10 min
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq −194 kg
- Boot lSmart #5 +45 l
Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Smart #5
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Enyaq 85 | Smart #5 Pro+ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 581 km | 590 km | Smart +9 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 94 kWh | Smart +17 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.9 kWh/100 km | 18.4 kWh/100 km | Škoda −3.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 135 kW | 400 kW | Smart +265 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Smart +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 18 min | Smart −10 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.5 km/min | 22.9 km/min | Smart +8.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Smart +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 363 PS | Smart +77 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | Smart −0.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h | Smart +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2066 kg | 2260 kg | Škoda −194 kg |
| Boot | 585 l | 630 l | Smart +45 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Smart |
| Length | 4658 mm | 4695 mm | Smart +37 mm |
| Width | 1879 mm | 1920 mm | Smart +41 mm |
| Height | 1622 mm | 1705 mm | Smart +83 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2900 mm | Smart +134 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Enyaq
Smart #5
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Enyaq
Smart #5
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Smart #5 — its 94 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Enyaq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Enyaq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Smart #5 up to 400 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 18 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Enyaq uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 18.4 kWh/100 km in the Smart #5. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 525 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.