Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y

Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 135 kW, Tesla Model Y 250 kW · Power — Škoda Enyaq 286 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · Boot — Škoda Enyaq 585 l, Tesla Model Y 822 l.

Škoda Enyaq

The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.

Tesla Model Y

The Tesla Model Y is an electric SUV in the D segment, offering three different drive configurations with varying ranges and acceleration performance.

Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y — who wins where

Tesla Model Y leads 8 to 1

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmTesla Model Y +41 km
    Škoda Enyaq
    581
    Tesla Model Y
    622
  • Battery kWhTesla Model Y +2 kWh
    Škoda Enyaq
    77
    Tesla Model Y
    79
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −0.7 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Enyaq
    14.9
    Tesla Model Y
    15.6
  • Power PSTesla Model Y +228 PS
    Škoda Enyaq
    286
    Tesla Model Y
    514
  • 0–100 km/h sTesla Model Y −1.9 s
    Škoda Enyaq
    6.7
    Tesla Model Y
    4.8
  • Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +21 km/h
    Škoda Enyaq
    180
    Tesla Model Y
    201
  • DC charging kWTesla Model Y +115 kW
    Škoda Enyaq
    135
    Tesla Model Y
    250
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Enyaq
    11
    Tesla Model Y
    11
  • Charging minNo data
    Škoda Enyaq
    28
    Tesla Model Y
  • Weight kgTesla Model Y −69 kg
    Škoda Enyaq
    2066
    Tesla Model Y
    1997
  • Boot lTesla Model Y +237 l
    Škoda Enyaq
    585
    Tesla Model Y
    822

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y
Key parameters Škoda Enyaq
85
Tesla Model Y
Premium AWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range581 km622 kmTesla +41 km
Battery77 kWh79 kWhTesla +2 kWh
Consumption14.9 kWh/100 km15.6 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging135 kW250 kWTesla +115 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min
Range per minute of charging14.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power286 PS514 PSTesla +228 PS
0–100 km/h6.7 s4.8 sTesla −1.9 s
Top speed180 km/h201 km/hTesla +21 km/h
DrivetrainRWDAWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2066 kg1997 kgTesla −69 kg
Boot585 l822 lTesla +237 l
Length4658 mm4790 mmTesla +132 mm
Width1879 mm1920 mmTesla +41 mm
Height1622 mm1624 mmTesla +2 mm
Wheelbase2766 mm2890 mmTesla +124 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Enyaq

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Tesla Model Y

Cost per 100 km4.68
Monthly59
Yearly702

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Enyaq

Tesla Model Y

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y?

The Tesla Model Y goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Škoda Enyaq. That is a difference of 41 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Enyaq and the Tesla Model Y differ?

The Škoda Enyaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.

Which is more powerful — Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y?

The Tesla Model Y is stronger: 514 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Enyaq. The gap is 228 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Tesla Model Y takes more: 822 l against 585 l in the Škoda Enyaq. The difference is 237 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.