Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y
Tesla Model Y leads 8 to 1
Biggest differences: Power — Škoda Enyaq 286 PS, Tesla Model Y 514 PS · DC charging — Škoda Enyaq 165 kW, Tesla Model Y 250 kW · 0–100 km/h — Škoda Enyaq 6.6 s, Tesla Model Y 4.6 s.
Škoda Enyaq
The Škoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available with RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 581 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Tesla Model Y
The Tesla Model Y is a segment D SUV offered in four variants in the 2026 model year: WLTP range from 525 to 622 km, 0-100 km/h acceleration from 7.2 to 3.5 seconds.
Profile against the market: Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y
Škoda Enyaq85
Tesla Model YPremium AWD
Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y — who wins where
Tesla Model Y leads 8 to 1
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmTesla Model Y +41 km
- Battery kWhTesla Model Y +2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSTesla Model Y +228 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sTesla Model Y −2 s
- Top speed km/hTesla Model Y +21 km/h
- DC charging kWTesla Model Y +85 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgTesla Model Y −69 kg
- Boot lTesla Model Y +237 l
Technical data: Škoda Enyaq vs Tesla Model Y
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Enyaq 85 | Tesla Model Y Premium AWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 581 km | 622 km | Tesla +41 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 79 kWh | Tesla +2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 15.6 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 250 kW | Tesla +85 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | — | — |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | — | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 514 PS | Tesla +228 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 4.6 s | Tesla −2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 201 km/h | Tesla +21 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2066 kg | 1997 kg | Tesla −69 kg |
| Boot | 585 l | 822 l | Tesla +237 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Škoda |
| Length | 4658 mm | 4790 mm | Tesla +132 mm |
| Width | 1879 mm | 1920 mm | Tesla +41 mm |
| Height | 1622 mm | 1624 mm | Tesla +2 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2890 mm | Tesla +124 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Enyaq
Tesla Model Y
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Enyaq
Tesla Model Y
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Škoda Enyaq. That is a difference of 41 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Enyaq and the Tesla Model Y differ?
The Škoda Enyaq has RWD and 286 PS. The Tesla Model Y has AWD and 514 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Enyaq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Tesla Model Y, with 79 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Škoda Enyaq or Tesla Model Y?
The Tesla Model Y is stronger: 514 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Enyaq. The gap is 228 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.