Kia EV6 vs Škoda Enyaq

Biggest differences: DC charging — Kia EV6 258 kW, Škoda Enyaq 135 kW · Charging 10–80% — Kia EV6 18 min, Škoda Enyaq 28 min · Power — Kia EV6 229 PS, Škoda Enyaq 286 PS.

Kia EV6

The Kia EV6 is an all-electric crossover in the D segment, offering three different powertrain and battery options with varying power outputs and ranges.

Škoda Enyaq

The Škoda Enyaq is an SUV in the D segment, offering four different powertrain options with varying power and range, and boasts a luggage capacity of 585 liters.

Profile against the market: Kia EV6 vs Škoda Enyaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia EV6 or Škoda Enyaq — who wins where

Kia EV6 leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmKia EV6 +1 km
    Kia EV6
    582
    Škoda Enyaq
    581
  • Battery kWhKia EV6 +7 kWh
    Kia EV6
    84
    Škoda Enyaq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −1 kWh/100 km
    Kia EV6
    15.9
    Škoda Enyaq
    14.9
  • Power PSŠkoda Enyaq +57 PS
    Kia EV6
    229
    Škoda Enyaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Enyaq −1 s
    Kia EV6
    7.7
    Škoda Enyaq
    6.7
  • Top speed km/hKia EV6 +5 km/h
    Kia EV6
    185
    Škoda Enyaq
    180
  • DC charging kWKia EV6 +123 kW
    Kia EV6
    258
    Škoda Enyaq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Kia EV6
    11
    Škoda Enyaq
    11
  • Charging minKia EV6 −10 min
    Kia EV6
    18
    Škoda Enyaq
    28
  • Weight kgKia EV6 −91 kg
    Kia EV6
    1975
    Škoda Enyaq
    2066
  • Boot lŠkoda Enyaq +95 l
    Kia EV6
    490
    Škoda Enyaq
    585

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia EV6 vs Škoda Enyaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia EV6 vs Škoda Enyaq
Key parameters Kia EV6
84 kWh RWD
Škoda Enyaq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range582 km581 kmKia +1 km
Battery84 kWh77 kWhKia +7 kWh
Consumption15.9 kWh/100 km14.9 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging258 kW135 kWKia +123 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%18 min28 minKia −10 min
Range per minute of charging22.6 km/min14.5 km/minKia +8.1 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VKia +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power229 PS286 PSŠkoda +57 PS
0–100 km/h7.7 s6.7 sŠkoda −1 s
Top speed185 km/h180 km/hKia +5 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1975 kg2066 kgKia −91 kg
Boot490 l585 lŠkoda +95 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly Kia
Length4695 mm4658 mmKia +37 mm
Width1890 mm1879 mmKia +11 mm
Height1550 mm1622 mmŠkoda +72 mm
Wheelbase2900 mm2766 mmKia +134 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia EV6

Cost per 100 km4.77
Monthly60
Yearly716

Škoda Enyaq

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia EV6

Škoda Enyaq

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia EV6 — its 84 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Enyaq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Enyaq takes more: 585 l against 490 l in the Kia EV6. The difference is 95 l.

Which charges faster?

The Kia EV6 accepts up to 258 kW DC, the Škoda Enyaq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 18 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Enyaq uses less electricity: 14.9 kWh/100 km against 15.9 kWh/100 km in the Kia EV6. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 150 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.