BMW iX4 vs Škoda Enyaq

BMW iX4 leads 7 to 3

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX4 400 kW, Škoda Enyaq 165 kW · Power — BMW iX4 469 PS, Škoda Enyaq 286 PS · WLTP range — BMW iX4 828 km, Škoda Enyaq 581 km.

BMW iX4

The BMW iX4 is an all-electric SUV in the D segment with all-wheel drive (AWD): it offers power outputs ranging from 374 to 469 horsepower, a range of up to 828 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 400 kW.

Škoda Enyaq

The Škoda Enyaq is an all-electric SUV in the D segment, available with RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 581 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.

Profile against the market: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Enyaq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX4 or Škoda Enyaq — who wins where

BMW iX4 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX4 +247 km
    BMW iX4
    828
    Škoda Enyaq
    581
  • Battery kWhBMW iX4 +31.7 kWh
    BMW iX4
    108.7
    Škoda Enyaq
    77
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Enyaq −0.5 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX4
    15.7
    Škoda Enyaq
    15.2
  • Power PSBMW iX4 +183 PS
    BMW iX4
    469
    Škoda Enyaq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX4 −1.7 s
    BMW iX4
    4.9
    Škoda Enyaq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX4 +30 km/h
    BMW iX4
    210
    Škoda Enyaq
    180
  • DC charging kWBMW iX4 +235 kW
    BMW iX4
    400
    Škoda Enyaq
    165
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX4
    11
    Škoda Enyaq
    11
  • Charging ↓ minBMW iX4 −8 min
    BMW iX4
    21
    Škoda Enyaq
    29
  • Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Enyaq −239 kg
    BMW iX4
    2305
    Škoda Enyaq
    2066
  • Boot lŠkoda Enyaq +95 l
    BMW iX4
    490
    Škoda Enyaq
    585

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Enyaq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX4 vs Škoda Enyaq
Key parameters BMW iX4
50 xDrive
Škoda Enyaq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range828 km581 kmBMW +247 km
Battery108.7 kWh77 kWhBMW +31.7 kWh
Consumption ↓15.7 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging400 kW165 kWBMW +235 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓21 min29 minBMW −8 min
Range per minute of charging27.6 km/min14 km/minBMW +13.6 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBMW +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power469 PS286 PSBMW +183 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.9 s6.6 sBMW −1.7 s
Top speed210 km/h180 km/hBMW +30 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2305 kg2066 kgŠkoda −239 kg
Boot490 l585 lŠkoda +95 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4782 mm4658 mmBMW +124 mm
Width1895 mm1879 mmBMW +16 mm
Height1595 mm1622 mmŠkoda +27 mm
Wheelbase2897 mm2766 mmBMW +131 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX4

Cost per 100 km4.71
Monthly59
Yearly707

Škoda Enyaq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX4

Škoda Enyaq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment D

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX4 or Škoda Enyaq?

The BMW iX4 goes further: 828 km WLTP against the 581 km of the Škoda Enyaq. That is a difference of 247 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX4 and the Škoda Enyaq differ?

The BMW iX4 has AWD and 469 PS. The Škoda Enyaq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which is more powerful — BMW iX4 or Škoda Enyaq?

The BMW iX4 is stronger: 469 PS against the 286 PS of the Škoda Enyaq. The gap is 183 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Enyaq takes more: 585 l against 490 l in the BMW iX4. The difference is 95 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.