Polestar 3 vs Volvo EX90

Biggest differences: Boot — Polestar 3 484 l, Volvo EX90 324 l · DC charging — Polestar 3 250 kW, Volvo EX90 350 kW · Charging 10–80% — Polestar 3 30 min, Volvo EX90 22 min.

Polestar 3

An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three drive variants with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Polestar 3 vs Volvo EX90

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Polestar 3 or Volvo EX90 — who wins where

Polestar 3 leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 3 +22 km
    Polestar 3
    647
    Volvo EX90
    625
  • Battery kWhPolestar 3 +1 kWh
    Polestar 3
    107
    Volvo EX90
    106
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Polestar 3
    19.6
    Volvo EX90
    19.4
  • Power PSPolestar 3 +33 PS
    Polestar 3
    489
    Volvo EX90
    456
  • 0–100 km/h sPolestar 3 −0.5 s
    Polestar 3
    5
    Volvo EX90
    5.5
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 3 +30 km/h
    Polestar 3
    210
    Volvo EX90
    180
  • DC charging kWVolvo EX90 +100 kW
    Polestar 3
    250
    Volvo EX90
    350
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Polestar 3
    11
    Volvo EX90
    11
  • Charging minVolvo EX90 −8 min
    Polestar 3
    30
    Volvo EX90
    22
  • Weight kgPolestar 3 −106 kg
    Polestar 3
    2584
    Volvo EX90
    2690
  • Boot lPolestar 3 +160 l
    Polestar 3
    484
    Volvo EX90
    324

Add a third car

Technical data: Polestar 3 vs Volvo EX90

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Polestar 3 vs Volvo EX90
Key parameters Polestar 3
Long Range Dual Motor
Volvo EX90
Twin Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range647 km625 kmPolestar +22 km
Battery107 kWh106 kWhPolestar +1 kWh
Consumption19.6 kWh/100 km19.4 kWh/100 kmVolvo −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging250 kW350 kWVolvo +100 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%30 min22 minVolvo −8 min
Range per minute of charging15.1 km/min19.9 km/minVolvo +4.8 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VVolvo +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power489 PS456 PSPolestar +33 PS
0–100 km/h5 s5.5 sPolestar −0.5 s
Top speed210 km/h180 km/hPolestar +30 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD
Practicality
Weight2584 kg2690 kgPolestar −106 kg
Boot484 l324 lPolestar +160 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Volvo
Length4900 mm5037 mmVolvo +137 mm
Width1968 mm1964 mmPolestar +4 mm
Height1614 mm1744 mmVolvo +130 mm
Wheelbase2985 mm2985 mmNo difference

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Polestar 3

Cost per 100 km5.88
Monthly74
Yearly882

Volvo EX90

Cost per 100 km5.82
Monthly73
Yearly873

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Polestar 3

Volvo EX90

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Polestar 3 or Volvo EX90?

The Polestar 3 goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 625 km of the Volvo EX90. That is a difference of 22 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Polestar 3, with 107 kWh, does not offer it.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Polestar 3 takes more: 484 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 160 l.

Which charges faster?

The Polestar 3 accepts up to 250 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 30 and 22 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.