Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs Volvo EX90
Biggest differences: Power — Hyundai Ioniq 9 218 PS, Volvo EX90 456 PS · 0–100 km/h — Hyundai Ioniq 9 9.4 s, Volvo EX90 5.5 s · DC charging — Hyundai Ioniq 9 233 kW, Volvo EX90 350 kW.
Hyundai Ioniq 9
The Hyundai Ioniq 9 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering a luggage capacity of 338 liters and three powertrain options with power ranging from 218 horsepower to 428 horsepower.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs Volvo EX90
Hyundai Ioniq 9Long Range RWD
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
Hyundai Ioniq 9 or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
Volvo EX90 leads 6 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX90 +5 km
- Battery kWhHyundai Ioniq 9 +4.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmHyundai Ioniq 9 −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX90 +238 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX90 −3.9 s
- Top speed km/hHyundai Ioniq 9 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX90 +117 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX90 +0.5 kW
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX90 −2 min
- Weight ↓ kgHyundai Ioniq 9 −220 kg
- Boot lHyundai Ioniq 9 +14 l
Technical data: Hyundai Ioniq 9 vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Hyundai Ioniq 9 Long Range RWD | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 620 km | 625 km | Volvo +5 km |
| Battery | 110.3 kWh | 106 kWh | Hyundai +4.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.3 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Hyundai −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 233 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +117 kW |
| AC charging | 10.5 kW | 11 kW | Volvo +0.5 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 24 min | 22 min | Volvo −2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 18.1 km/min | 19.9 km/min | Volvo +1.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 218 PS | 456 PS | Volvo +238 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 9.4 s | 5.5 s | Volvo −3.9 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 180 km/h | Hyundai +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2470 kg | 2690 kg | Hyundai −220 kg |
| Boot | 338 l | 324 l | Hyundai +14 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 5060 mm | 5037 mm | Hyundai +23 mm |
| Width | 1980 mm | 1964 mm | Hyundai +16 mm |
| Height | 1790 mm | 1744 mm | Hyundai +46 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3130 mm | 2985 mm | Hyundai +145 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Hyundai Ioniq 9
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Hyundai Ioniq 9
Volvo EX90
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Hyundai Ioniq 9 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Volvo EX90?
The Hyundai Ioniq 9 carries 110.3 kWh and covers 620 km, while the Volvo EX90 with its 106 kWh battery does 625 km. Energy use decides it: 17.3 against 19.4 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Hyundai Ioniq 9 and the Volvo EX90 differ?
The Hyundai Ioniq 9 has RWD and 218 PS. The Volvo EX90 has AWD and 456 PS.
Which is more powerful — Hyundai Ioniq 9 or Volvo EX90?
The Volvo EX90 is stronger: 456 PS against the 218 PS of the Hyundai Ioniq 9. The gap is 238 PS.
Which charges faster?
The Hyundai Ioniq 9 accepts up to 233 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 24 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.