Volvo EX90 vs Xpeng G9L

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Biggest differences: Boot — Volvo EX90 324 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l · Charging 10–80% — Volvo EX90 22 min, Xpeng G9L 12 min · DC charging — Volvo EX90 350 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW.

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.

Xpeng G9L

The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.

Profile against the market: Volvo EX90 vs Xpeng G9L

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Volvo EX90 or Xpeng G9L — who wins where

It's a tie: 5 to 5

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmVolvo EX90 +34 km
    Volvo EX90
    625
    Xpeng G9L
    591
  • Battery kWhXpeng G9L +4 kWh
    Volvo EX90
    106
    Xpeng G9L
    110
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −1.7 kWh/100 km
    Volvo EX90
    19.4
    Xpeng G9L
    21.1
  • Power PSVolvo EX90 +89 PS
    Volvo EX90
    456
    Xpeng G9L
    367
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX90 −1.5 s
    Volvo EX90
    5.5
    Xpeng G9L
    7
  • Top speed km/hXpeng G9L +20 km/h
    Volvo EX90
    180
    Xpeng G9L
    200
  • DC charging kWXpeng G9L +190 kW
    Volvo EX90
    350
    Xpeng G9L
    540
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Volvo EX90
    11
    Xpeng G9L
    11
  • Charging ↓ minXpeng G9L −10 min
    Volvo EX90
    22
    Xpeng G9L
    12
  • Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX90 −10 kg
    Volvo EX90
    2690
    Xpeng G9L
    2700
  • Boot lXpeng G9L +611 l
    Volvo EX90
    324
    Xpeng G9L
    935

Add a third car

Technical data: Volvo EX90 vs Xpeng G9L

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Volvo EX90 vs Xpeng G9L
Key parameters Volvo EX90
Twin Motor
Xpeng G9L
RWD Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range625 km591 kmVolvo +34 km
Battery106 kWh110 kWhXpeng +4 kWh
Consumption ↓19.4 kWh/100 km21.1 kWh/100 kmVolvo −1.7 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging350 kW540 kWXpeng +190 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓22 min12 minXpeng −10 min
Range per minute of charging19.9 km/min34.5 km/minXpeng +14.6 km/min
Voltage800 V800 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power456 PS367 PSVolvo +89 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.5 s7 sVolvo −1.5 s
Top speed180 km/h200 km/hXpeng +20 km/h
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2690 kg2700 kgVolvo −10 kg
Boot324 l935 lXpeng +611 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length5037 mm5120 mmXpeng +83 mm
Width1964 mm1999 mmXpeng +35 mm
Height1744 mm1788 mmXpeng +44 mm
Wheelbase2985 mm3100 mmXpeng +115 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Volvo EX90

Cost per 100 km5.82
Monthly73
Yearly873

Xpeng G9L

Cost per 100 km6.33
Monthly79
Yearly950

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Volvo EX90

Xpeng G9L

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Volvo EX90 or Xpeng G9L?

The Volvo EX90 goes further: 625 km WLTP against the 591 km of the Xpeng G9L. That is a difference of 34 km.

Why does the Xpeng G9L have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Volvo EX90?

The Xpeng G9L carries 110 kWh and covers 591 km, while the Volvo EX90 with its 106 kWh battery does 625 km. Energy use decides it: 21.1 against 19.4 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Volvo EX90 and the Xpeng G9L differ?

The Volvo EX90 has AWD and 456 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 611 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.