Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9L
Maserati Grecale Folgore leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: DC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW · AC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 22 kW, Xpeng G9L 11 kW · Boot — Maserati Grecale Folgore 535 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Xpeng G9L
The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.
Profile against the market: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9L
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
Xpeng G9LRWD Long Range
Maserati Grecale Folgore or Xpeng G9L — who wins where
Maserati Grecale Folgore leads 6 to 4
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +11 km
- Battery kWhXpeng G9L +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmMaserati Grecale Folgore −0.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaserati Grecale Folgore +190 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMaserati Grecale Folgore −2.9 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +20 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G9L +390 kW
- AC charging kWMaserati Grecale Folgore +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgMaserati Grecale Folgore −145 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9L +400 l
Technical data: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9L
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh AWD | Xpeng G9L RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 591 km | Xpeng +11 km |
| Battery | 105 kWh | 110 kWh | Xpeng +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.9 kWh/100 km | 21.1 kWh/100 km | Maserati −0.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 540 kW | Xpeng +390 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Maserati +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 12 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 34.5 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 557 PS | 367 PS | Maserati +190 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.1 s | 7 s | Maserati −2.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 200 km/h | Maserati +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2555 kg | 2700 kg | Maserati −145 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 935 l | Xpeng +400 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4865 mm | 5120 mm | Xpeng +255 mm |
| Width | 1948 mm | 1999 mm | Xpeng +51 mm |
| Height | 1651 mm | 1788 mm | Xpeng +137 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2903 mm | 3100 mm | Xpeng +197 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Xpeng G9L
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Xpeng G9L
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the Maserati Grecale Folgore and the Xpeng G9L differ?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore has AWD and 557 PS. The Xpeng G9L has RWD and 367 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G9L — its 110 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Maserati Grecale Folgore, with 105 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Maserati Grecale Folgore or Xpeng G9L?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is stronger: 557 PS against the 367 PS of the Xpeng G9L. The gap is 190 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 535 l in the Maserati Grecale Folgore. The difference is 400 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.