Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9
Biggest differences: DC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 150 kW, Xpeng G9 445 kW · AC charging — Maserati Grecale Folgore 22 kW, Xpeng G9 11 kW · Power — Maserati Grecale Folgore 557 PS, Xpeng G9 351 PS.
Maserati Grecale Folgore
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is an all-wheel-drive electric SUV offering a WLTP range of 580 kilometers and a power output of 557 horsepower.
Xpeng G9
An electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive options, with the most powerful version accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds.
Profile against the market: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9
Maserati Grecale Folgore105 kWh AWD
Xpeng G9RWD Long Range
Maserati Grecale Folgore or Xpeng G9 — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G9 +5 km
- Battery kWhMaserati Grecale Folgore +12.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9 −2.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMaserati Grecale Folgore +206 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMaserati Grecale Folgore −2.3 s
- Top speed km/hMaserati Grecale Folgore +20 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G9 +295 kW
- AC charging kWMaserati Grecale Folgore +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo data
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9 −265 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9 +125 l
Technical data: Maserati Grecale Folgore vs Xpeng G9
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Maserati Grecale Folgore 105 kWh AWD | Xpeng G9 RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 580 km | 585 km | Xpeng +5 km |
| Battery | 105 kWh | 92.2 kWh | Maserati +12.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 20.9 kWh/100 km | 18.6 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −2.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 445 kW | Xpeng +295 kW |
| AC charging | 22 kW | 11 kW | Maserati +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | — | 12 min | — |
| Range per minute of charging | — | 34.1 km/min | — |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 557 PS | 351 PS | Maserati +206 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.1 s | 6.4 s | Maserati −2.3 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 200 km/h | Maserati +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2555 kg | 2290 kg | Xpeng −265 kg |
| Boot | 535 l | 660 l | Xpeng +125 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4865 mm | 4891 mm | Xpeng +26 mm |
| Width | 1948 mm | 1937 mm | Maserati +11 mm |
| Height | 1651 mm | 1680 mm | Xpeng +29 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2903 mm | 2998 mm | Xpeng +95 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Xpeng G9
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Maserati Grecale Folgore
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the Maserati Grecale Folgore have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng G9?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore carries 105 kWh and covers 580 km, while the Xpeng G9 with its 92.2 kWh battery does 585 km. Energy use decides it: 20.9 against 18.6 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Maserati Grecale Folgore and the Xpeng G9 differ?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore has AWD and 557 PS. The Xpeng G9 has RWD and 351 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G9 — its 92.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Maserati Grecale Folgore, with 105 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — Maserati Grecale Folgore or Xpeng G9?
The Maserati Grecale Folgore is stronger: 557 PS against the 351 PS of the Xpeng G9. The gap is 206 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.