BMW iX vs Xpeng G9
Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — BMW iX 35 min, Xpeng G9 12 min · DC charging — BMW iX 195 kW, Xpeng G9 445 kW · Power — BMW iX 544 PS, Xpeng G9 351 PS.
BMW iX
An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of up to 701 kilometers.
Xpeng G9
An electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive options, with the most powerful version accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds.
Profile against the market: BMW iX vs Xpeng G9
BMW iX or Xpeng G9 — who wins where
Xpeng G9 leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX +116 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX +16.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9 −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX +193 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX −1.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWXpeng G9 +250 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G9 −23 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9 −215 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9 +160 l
Technical data: BMW iX vs Xpeng G9
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  BMW iXxDrive60 |  Xpeng G9RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 701 km | 585 km | BMW +116 km |
| Battery | 109.1 kWh | 92.2 kWh | BMW +16.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.9 kWh/100 km | 18.6 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 195 kW | 445 kW | Xpeng +250 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 35 min | 12 min | Xpeng −23 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | 34.1 km/min | Xpeng +20.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Xpeng +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 544 PS | 351 PS | BMW +193 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.6 s | 6.4 s | BMW −1.8 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 200 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | AWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2505 kg | 2290 kg | Xpeng −215 kg |
| Boot | 500 l | 660 l | Xpeng +160 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4965 mm | 4891 mm | BMW +74 mm |
| Width | 1970 mm | 1937 mm | BMW +33 mm |
| Height | 1695 mm | 1680 mm | BMW +15 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2998 mm | BMW +2 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX
Xpeng G9
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX or Xpeng G9?
The BMW iX goes further: 701 km WLTP against the 585 km of the Xpeng G9. That is a difference of 116 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX and the Xpeng G9 differ?
The BMW iX has AWD and 544 PS. The Xpeng G9 has RWD and 351 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng G9 — its 92.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX, with 109.1 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX or Xpeng G9?
The BMW iX is stronger: 544 PS against the 351 PS of the Xpeng G9. The gap is 193 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.