Xpeng G9 vs Xpeng G9L
Xpeng G9L leads 5 to 3
Biggest differences: Boot — Xpeng G9 660 l, Xpeng G9L 935 l · DC charging — Xpeng G9 445 kW, Xpeng G9L 540 kW · Battery — Xpeng G9 92.2 kWh, Xpeng G9L 110 kWh.
Xpeng G9
An electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive options, with the most powerful version accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds.
Xpeng G9L
The Xpeng G9L is a seven-seat E-segment SUV: a 110 kWh battery, a WLTP range of up to 591 km and 540 kW DC charging.
Profile against the market: Xpeng G9 vs Xpeng G9L
Xpeng G9 or Xpeng G9L — who wins where
Xpeng G9L leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng G9L +6 km
- Battery kWhXpeng G9L +17.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmXpeng G9 −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSXpeng G9L +16 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sXpeng G9 −0.6 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWXpeng G9L +95 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9 −410 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9L +275 l
Technical data: Xpeng G9 vs Xpeng G9L
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Xpeng G9RWD Long Range | Xpeng G9L RWD Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 585 km | 591 km | Xpeng +6 km |
| Battery | 92.2 kWh | 110 kWh | Xpeng +17.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 21.1 kWh/100 km | Xpeng −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 445 kW | 540 kW | Xpeng +95 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 12 min | 12 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 34.1 km/min | 34.5 km/min | Xpeng +0.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 351 PS | 367 PS | Xpeng +16 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.4 s | 7 s | Xpeng −0.6 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 200 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2290 kg | 2700 kg | Xpeng −410 kg |
| Boot | 660 l | 935 l | Xpeng +275 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4891 mm | 5120 mm | Xpeng +229 mm |
| Width | 1937 mm | 1999 mm | Xpeng +62 mm |
| Height | 1680 mm | 1788 mm | Xpeng +108 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2998 mm | 3100 mm | Xpeng +102 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Xpeng G9
Xpeng G9L
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Xpeng G9L takes more: 935 l against 660 l in the Xpeng G9. The difference is 275 l.
Which charges faster?
The Xpeng G9 accepts up to 445 kW DC, the Xpeng G9L up to 540 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 12 and 12 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Xpeng G9 uses less electricity: 18.6 kWh/100 km against 21.1 kWh/100 km in the Xpeng G9L. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 375 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.