Xpeng G9 vs Zeekr 7X
Biggest differences: AC charging — Xpeng G9 11 kW, Zeekr 7X 22 kW · Charging 10–80% — Xpeng G9 12 min, Zeekr 7X 16 min · Boot — Xpeng G9 660 l, Zeekr 7X 539 l.
Xpeng G9
An electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive options, with the most powerful version accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in 4.2 seconds.
Zeekr 7X
This electric SUV, belonging to the D-segment, offers three different powertrain options with power ranging from 421 horsepower to 646 horsepower, and features fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Xpeng G9 vs Zeekr 7X
Xpeng G9 or Zeekr 7X — who wins where
Zeekr 7X leads 7 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmZeekr 7X +30 km
- Battery kWhZeekr 7X +7.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmZeekr 7X −0.9 kWh/100 km
- Power PSZeekr 7X +70 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sZeekr 7X −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hZeekr 7X +10 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng G9 +25 kW
- AC charging kWZeekr 7X +11 kW
- Charging ↓ minXpeng G9 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng G9 −125 kg
- Boot lXpeng G9 +121 l
Technical data: Xpeng G9 vs Zeekr 7X
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  Xpeng G9RWD Long Range |  Zeekr 7XLong Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 585 km | 615 km | Zeekr +30 km |
| Battery | 92.2 kWh | 100 kWh | Zeekr +7.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 18.6 kWh/100 km | 17.7 kWh/100 km | Zeekr −0.9 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 445 kW | 420 kW | Xpeng +25 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 22 kW | Zeekr +11 kW |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 12 min | 16 min | Xpeng −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 34.1 km/min | 26.9 km/min | Xpeng +7.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 800 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 351 PS | 421 PS | Zeekr +70 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.4 s | 6 s | Zeekr −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 210 km/h | Zeekr +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2290 kg | 2415 kg | Xpeng −125 kg |
| Boot | 660 l | 539 l | Xpeng +121 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4891 mm | 4787 mm | Xpeng +104 mm |
| Width | 1937 mm | 1930 mm | Xpeng +7 mm |
| Height | 1680 mm | 1650 mm | Xpeng +30 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2998 mm | 2900 mm | Xpeng +98 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Xpeng G9
Zeekr 7X
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Xpeng G9 or Zeekr 7X?
The Zeekr 7X goes further: 615 km WLTP against the 585 km of the Xpeng G9. That is a difference of 30 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Xpeng G9 takes more: 660 l against 539 l in the Zeekr 7X. The difference is 121 l.
Which charges faster?
The Xpeng G9 accepts up to 445 kW DC, the Zeekr 7X up to 420 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 12 and 16 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Zeekr 7X uses less electricity: 17.7 kWh/100 km against 18.6 kWh/100 km in the Xpeng G9. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 135 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.