BMW iX vs Volvo EX90
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX 195 kW, Volvo EX90 350 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX 35 min, Volvo EX90 22 min · Boot — BMW iX 500 l, Volvo EX90 324 l.
BMW iX
An all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering all-wheel drive and a WLTP range of up to 701 kilometers.
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three powertrain options with power ranging from 333 horsepower to 680 horsepower.
Profile against the market: BMW iX vs Volvo EX90
BMW iXxDrive60
Volvo EX90Twin Motor
BMW iX or Volvo EX90 — who wins where
BMW iX leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX +76 km
- Battery kWhBMW iX +3.1 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmVolvo EX90 −2.5 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBMW iX +88 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBMW iX −0.9 s
- Top speed km/hBMW iX +20 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX90 +155 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minVolvo EX90 −13 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX −185 kg
- Boot lBMW iX +176 l
Technical data: BMW iX vs Volvo EX90
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX xDrive60 | Volvo EX90 Twin Motor | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 701 km | 625 km | BMW +76 km |
| Battery | 109.1 kWh | 106 kWh | BMW +3.1 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 21.9 kWh/100 km | 19.4 kWh/100 km | Volvo −2.5 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 195 kW | 350 kW | Volvo +155 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 35 min | 22 min | Volvo −13 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14 km/min | 19.9 km/min | Volvo +5.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | Volvo +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 544 PS | 456 PS | BMW +88 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 4.6 s | 5.5 s | BMW −0.9 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h | BMW +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2505 kg | 2690 kg | BMW −185 kg |
| Boot | 500 l | 324 l | BMW +176 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Volvo |
| Length | 4965 mm | 5037 mm | Volvo +72 mm |
| Width | 1970 mm | 1964 mm | BMW +6 mm |
| Height | 1695 mm | 1744 mm | Volvo +49 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2985 mm | BMW +15 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX
Volvo EX90
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BMW iX or Volvo EX90?
The BMW iX goes further: 701 km WLTP against the 625 km of the Volvo EX90. That is a difference of 76 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Volvo EX90 — its 106 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX, with 109.1 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX takes more: 500 l against 324 l in the Volvo EX90. The difference is 176 l.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX accepts up to 195 kW DC, the Volvo EX90 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 35 and 22 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.