Mercedes EQE SUV vs Polestar 3

Polestar 3 leads 8 to 1

Biggest differences: DC charging — Mercedes EQE SUV 170 kW, Polestar 3 350 kW · Charging 10–80% — Mercedes EQE SUV 32 min, Polestar 3 22 min · Power — Mercedes EQE SUV 449 PS, Polestar 3 544 PS.

Mercedes EQE SUV

The Mercedes EQE SUV is an all-electric SUV in the E segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Polestar 3

Polestar 3 is a large E-segment SUV in three variants: WLTP range from 601 to 647 km, power from 333 to 680 hp.

Profile against the market: Mercedes EQE SUV vs Polestar 3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Mercedes EQE SUV or Polestar 3 — who wins where

Polestar 3 leads 8 to 1

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPolestar 3 +50 km
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    597
    Polestar 3
    647
  • Battery kWhPolestar 3 +10 kWh
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    96
    Polestar 3
    106
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPolestar 3 −0.3 kWh/100 km
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    19.3
    Polestar 3
    19
  • Power PSPolestar 3 +95 PS
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    449
    Polestar 3
    544
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    4.7
    Polestar 3
    4.7
  • Top speed km/hPolestar 3 +20 km/h
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    210
    Polestar 3
    230
  • DC charging kWPolestar 3 +180 kW
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    170
    Polestar 3
    350
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    11
    Polestar 3
    11
  • Charging ↓ minPolestar 3 −10 min
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    32
    Polestar 3
    22
  • Weight ↓ kgPolestar 3 −125 kg
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    2615
    Polestar 3
    2490
  • Boot lMercedes EQE SUV +36 l
    Mercedes EQE SUV
    520
    Polestar 3
    484

Add a third car

Technical data: Mercedes EQE SUV vs Polestar 3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Mercedes EQE SUV vs Polestar 3
Key parameters Mercedes EQE SUV
EQE 500 4MATIC
Polestar 3
Dual Motor
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range597 km647 kmPolestar +50 km
Battery96 kWh106 kWhPolestar +10 kWh
Consumption ↓19.3 kWh/100 km19 kWh/100 kmPolestar −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging170 kW350 kWPolestar +180 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓32 min22 minPolestar −10 min
Range per minute of charging13.1 km/min20.6 km/minPolestar +7.5 km/min
Voltage400 V800 VPolestar +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power449 PS544 PSPolestar +95 PS
0–100 km/h ↓4.7 s4.7 sNo difference
Top speed210 km/h230 km/hPolestar +20 km/h
DrivetrainAWDAWD—
Practicality
Weight ↓2615 kg2490 kgPolestar −125 kg
Boot520 l484 lMercedes +36 l
Length4863 mm4900 mmPolestar +37 mm
Width1940 mm——
Height1707 mm1622 mmMercedes +85 mm
Wheelbase3030 mm2985 mmMercedes +45 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Mercedes EQE SUV

Cost per 100 km5.79
Monthly72
Yearly869

Polestar 3

Cost per 100 km5.7
Monthly71
Yearly855

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Mercedes EQE SUV

Polestar 3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment E

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Mercedes EQE SUV or Polestar 3?

The Polestar 3 goes further: 647 km WLTP against the 597 km of the Mercedes EQE SUV. That is a difference of 50 km.

Which charges faster?

The Mercedes EQE SUV accepts up to 170 kW DC, the Polestar 3 up to 350 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 32 and 22 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.