Nissan Leaf vs Toyota C-HR+

Biggest differences: Boot — Nissan Leaf 437 l, Toyota C-HR+ 416 l · Battery — Nissan Leaf 75 kWh, Toyota C-HR+ 72 kWh · Power — Nissan Leaf 217 PS, Toyota C-HR+ 224 PS.

Nissan Leaf

The Nissan Leaf is a crossover in the C segment with front-wheel drive, offering two battery options and a range of up to 622 kilometers (in the MY2026 model).

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.

Profile against the market: Nissan Leaf vs Toyota C-HR+

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Nissan Leaf or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where

Nissan Leaf leads 4 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +16 km
    Nissan Leaf
    622
    Toyota C-HR+
    606
  • Battery kWhNissan Leaf +3 kWh
    Nissan Leaf
    75
    Toyota C-HR+
    72
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −0.4 kWh/100 km
    Nissan Leaf
    13.8
    Toyota C-HR+
    13.4
  • Power PSToyota C-HR+ +7 PS
    Nissan Leaf
    217
    Toyota C-HR+
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sToyota C-HR+ −0.2 s
    Nissan Leaf
    7.6
    Toyota C-HR+
    7.4
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Nissan Leaf
    160
    Toyota C-HR+
    160
  • DC charging kWNo difference
    Nissan Leaf
    150
    Toyota C-HR+
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Nissan Leaf
    11
    Toyota C-HR+
    11
  • Weight kgNissan Leaf −7 kg
    Nissan Leaf
    1883
    Toyota C-HR+
    1890
  • Boot lNissan Leaf +21 l
    Nissan Leaf
    437
    Toyota C-HR+
    416

Add a third car

Technical data: Nissan Leaf vs Toyota C-HR+

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Nissan Leaf vs Toyota C-HR+
Key parameters Nissan Leaf
75 kWh
Toyota C-HR+
77 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range622 km606 kmNissan +16 km
Battery75 kWh72 kWhNissan +3 kWh
Consumption13.8 kWh/100 km13.4 kWh/100 kmToyota −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging150 kW150 kWNo difference
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 30 min 20–80%28 min 10–80%2 min
Range per minute of charging12.4 km/min15.2 km/minToyota +2.8 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power217 PS224 PSToyota +7 PS
0–100 km/h7.6 s7.4 sToyota −0.2 s
Top speed160 km/h160 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1883 kg1890 kgNissan −7 kg
Boot437 l416 lNissan +21 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4350 mm4520 mmToyota +170 mm
Width1810 mm1870 mmToyota +60 mm
Height1550 mm1595 mmToyota +45 mm
Wheelbase2690 mm2750 mmToyota +60 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Nissan Leaf

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

Toyota C-HR+

Cost per 100 km4.02
Monthly50
Yearly603

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Nissan Leaf

Toyota C-HR+

Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Nissan Leaf or Toyota C-HR+?

The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 606 km of the Toyota C-HR+. That is a difference of 16 km.

Which charges faster?

The Nissan Leaf accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Toyota C-HR+ up to 150 kW.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Toyota C-HR+ uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 13.8 kWh/100 km in the Nissan Leaf. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.