Kia EV3 vs Toyota C-HR+

Biggest differences: DC charging — Kia EV3 128 kW, Toyota C-HR+ 150 kW · Battery — Kia EV3 81.4 kWh, Toyota C-HR+ 72 kWh · Consumption — Kia EV3 14.9 kWh/100 km, Toyota C-HR+ 13.4 kWh/100 km.

Kia EV3

The Kia EV3 is an all-electric compact SUV, offering four different powertrain configurations with varying ranges and performance levels.

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C-HR+ is a crossover in the C segment that offers three different powertrain options with varying power outputs and ranges, with a top speed of up to 180 km/h.

Profile against the market: Kia EV3 vs Toyota C-HR+

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Kia EV3 or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where

Toyota C-HR+ leads 6 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +1 km
    Kia EV3
    605
    Toyota C-HR+
    606
  • Battery kWhKia EV3 +9.4 kWh
    Kia EV3
    81.4
    Toyota C-HR+
    72
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −1.5 kWh/100 km
    Kia EV3
    14.9
    Toyota C-HR+
    13.4
  • Power PSToyota C-HR+ +20 PS
    Kia EV3
    204
    Toyota C-HR+
    224
  • 0–100 km/h sToyota C-HR+ −0.3 s
    Kia EV3
    7.7
    Toyota C-HR+
    7.4
  • Top speed km/hKia EV3 +10 km/h
    Kia EV3
    170
    Toyota C-HR+
    160
  • DC charging kWToyota C-HR+ +22 kW
    Kia EV3
    128
    Toyota C-HR+
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Kia EV3
    11
    Toyota C-HR+
    11
  • Charging minToyota C-HR+ −3 min
    Kia EV3
    31
    Toyota C-HR+
    28
  • Weight kgKia EV3 −80 kg
    Kia EV3
    1810
    Toyota C-HR+
    1890
  • Boot lKia EV3 +44 l
    Kia EV3
    460
    Toyota C-HR+
    416

Add a third car

Technical data: Kia EV3 vs Toyota C-HR+

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Kia EV3 vs Toyota C-HR+
Key parameters Kia EV3
81.4 kWh FWD
Toyota C-HR+
77 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range605 km606 kmToyota +1 km
Battery81.4 kWh72 kWhKia +9.4 kWh
Consumption14.9 kWh/100 km13.4 kWh/100 kmToyota −1.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging128 kW150 kWToyota +22 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%31 min28 minToyota −3 min
Range per minute of charging13.7 km/min15.2 km/minToyota +1.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS224 PSToyota +20 PS
0–100 km/h7.7 s7.4 sToyota −0.3 s
Top speed170 km/h160 km/hKia +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1810 kg1890 kgKia −80 kg
Boot460 l416 lKia +44 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4300 mm4520 mmToyota +220 mm
Width1850 mm1870 mmToyota +20 mm
Height1560 mm1595 mmToyota +35 mm
Wheelbase2680 mm2750 mmToyota +70 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Kia EV3

Cost per 100 km4.47
Monthly56
Yearly671

Toyota C-HR+

Cost per 100 km4.02
Monthly50
Yearly603

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Kia EV3

Toyota C-HR+

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the Kia EV3 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota C-HR+?

The Kia EV3 carries 81.4 kWh and covers 605 km, while the Toyota C-HR+ with its 72 kWh battery does 606 km. Energy use decides it: 14.9 against 13.4 kWh/100 km.

Which charges faster?

The Kia EV3 accepts up to 128 kW DC, the Toyota C-HR+ up to 150 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 31 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Toyota C-HR+ uses less electricity: 13.4 kWh/100 km against 14.9 kWh/100 km in the Kia EV3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 225 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.