Škoda Elroq vs Toyota C-HR+
Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: Power — Škoda Elroq 299 PS, Toyota C-HR+ 224 PS · 0–100 km/h — Škoda Elroq 6.2 s, Toyota C-HR+ 7.4 s · Consumption — Škoda Elroq 15.5 kWh/100 km, Toyota C-HR+ 13.4 kWh/100 km.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Toyota C-HR+
Toyota C-HR+ is a C-segment crossover in three variants: WLTP range from 458 to 606 km, power from 167 to 343 hp.
Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Toyota C-HR+
Škoda Elroq85x
Toyota C-HR+77 kWh
Škoda Elroq or Toyota C-HR+ — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmToyota C-HR+ +30 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmToyota C-HR+ −2.1 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +75 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.2 s
- Top speed km/hŠkoda Elroq +20 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +15 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minToyota C-HR+ −1 min
- Weight ↓ kgToyota C-HR+ −242 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +54 l
Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Toyota C-HR+
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Elroq 85x | Toyota C-HR+ 77 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 576 km | 606 km | Toyota +30 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 72 kWh | Škoda +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 13.4 kWh/100 km | Toyota −2.1 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 165 kW | 150 kW | Škoda +15 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 28 min | Toyota −1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 13.9 km/min | 15.2 km/min | Toyota +1.3 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 299 PS | 224 PS | Škoda +75 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.2 s | 7.4 s | Škoda −1.2 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | Škoda +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2132 kg | 1890 kg | Toyota −242 kg |
| Boot | 470 l | 416 l | Škoda +54 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4488 mm | 4520 mm | Toyota +32 mm |
| Width | 1884 mm | 1870 mm | Škoda +14 mm |
| Height | 1620 mm | 1595 mm | Škoda +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2766 mm | 2750 mm | Škoda +16 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Toyota C-HR+?
The Toyota C-HR+ goes further: 606 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 30 km.
Why does the Škoda Elroq have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Toyota C-HR+?
The Škoda Elroq carries 77 kWh and covers 576 km, while the Toyota C-HR+ with its 72 kWh battery does 606 km. Energy use decides it: 15.5 against 13.4 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Elroq and the Toyota C-HR+ differ?
The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS. The Toyota C-HR+ has FWD and 224 PS.
Which is more powerful — Škoda Elroq or Toyota C-HR+?
The Škoda Elroq is stronger: 299 PS against the 224 PS of the Toyota C-HR+. The gap is 75 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.