Lancia Gamma vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 4
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Škoda Elroq 11 kW · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Škoda Elroq 576 km · Battery — Lancia Gamma 97.2 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Škoda Elroq
Lancia GammaLong Range
Škoda Elroq85x
Lancia Gamma or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +165 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +20.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +54 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −1.6 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +5 kW
- AC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Elroq −3 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +90 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 576 km | Lancia +165 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 77 kWh | Lancia +20.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 165 kW | Škoda +5 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW | Škoda +4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Lancia +2.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +54 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −1.6 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 180 km/h | Lancia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 2132 kg | Škoda −3 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 470 l | Lancia +90 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4488 mm | Lancia +184 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1884 mm | Lancia +14 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1620 mm | Lancia +44 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | 2766 mm | Lancia +25 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Škoda Elroq?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 165 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 90 l.
Which charges faster?
The Lancia Gamma accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 165 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.