Jeep Compass vs Lancia Gamma
Lancia Gamma leads 8 to 1
Biggest differences: AC charging — Jeep Compass 11 kW, Lancia Gamma 7 kW · WLTP range — Jeep Compass 674 km, Lancia Gamma 741 km · Consumption — Jeep Compass 17.8 kWh/100 km, Lancia Gamma 16.2 kWh/100 km.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is a C-segment SUV in three electric variants: WLTP range from 500 to 674 km, power from 213 to 375 hp.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Profile against the market: Jeep Compass vs Lancia Gamma
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Lancia GammaLong Range
Jeep Compass or Lancia Gamma — who wins where
Lancia Gamma leads 8 to 1
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +67 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +0.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Gamma −1.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSLancia Gamma +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sLancia Gamma −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWJeep Compass +4 kW
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgLancia Gamma −25 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +10 l
Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Lancia Gamma
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 674 km | 741 km | Lancia +67 km |
| Battery | 96.3 kWh | 97.2 kWh | Lancia +0.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 16.2 kWh/100 km | Lancia −1.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 160 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 7 kW | Jeep +4 kW |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 27 min | 27 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 15 km/min | 16.5 km/min | Lancia +1.5 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 245 PS | Lancia +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.3 s | 7.8 s | Lancia −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 190 km/h | Lancia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2160 kg | 2135 kg | Lancia −25 kg |
| Boot | 550 l | 560 l | Lancia +10 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Lancia |
| Length | 4548 mm | 4672 mm | Lancia +124 mm |
| Width | 1936 mm | 1898 mm | Jeep +38 mm |
| Height | 1657 mm | 1664 mm | Lancia +7 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2795 mm | 2791 mm | Jeep +4 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Jeep Compass
Lancia Gamma
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Jeep Compass
Lancia Gamma
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Jeep Compass or Lancia Gamma?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 674 km of the Jeep Compass. That is a difference of 67 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Compass, with 96.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Jeep Compass accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Lancia Gamma up to 160 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 27 and 27 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Lancia Gamma uses less electricity: 16.2 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Jeep Compass. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 240 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.