Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 3
Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Jeep Compass 8.3 s, Škoda Elroq 6.2 s · Power — Jeep Compass 231 PS, Škoda Elroq 299 PS · Battery — Jeep Compass 96.3 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is a C-segment SUV in three electric variants: WLTP range from 500 to 674 km, power from 213 to 375 hp.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.
Profile against the market: Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Škoda Elroq85x
Jeep Compass or Škoda Elroq — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmJeep Compass +98 km
- Battery kWhJeep Compass +19.3 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −2.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +68 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWŠkoda Elroq +5 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgŠkoda Elroq −28 kg
- Boot lJeep Compass +80 l
Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Škoda Elroq 85x | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 674 km | 576 km | Jeep +98 km |
| Battery | 96.3 kWh | 77 kWh | Jeep +19.3 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 15.5 kWh/100 km | Škoda −2.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 165 kW | Škoda +5 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 29 min 10–80% | 2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15 km/min | 13.9 km/min | Jeep +1.1 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 299 PS | Škoda +68 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.3 s | 6.2 s | Škoda −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2160 kg | 2132 kg | Škoda −28 kg |
| Boot | 550 l | 470 l | Jeep +80 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Škoda |
| Length | 4548 mm | 4488 mm | Jeep +60 mm |
| Width | 1936 mm | 1884 mm | Jeep +52 mm |
| Height | 1657 mm | 1620 mm | Jeep +37 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2795 mm | 2766 mm | Jeep +29 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Jeep Compass
Škoda Elroq
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Jeep Compass
Škoda Elroq
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Jeep Compass or Škoda Elroq?
The Jeep Compass goes further: 674 km WLTP against the 576 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 98 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Jeep Compass and the Škoda Elroq differ?
The Jeep Compass has FWD and 231 PS. The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Škoda Elroq — its 77 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Compass, with 96.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Jeep Compass takes more: 550 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 80 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.