Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — Jeep Compass 8.3 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · Battery — Jeep Compass 96.3 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh · Power — Jeep Compass 231 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS.

Jeep Compass

The Jeep Compass is an SUV in the C segment, available with three different powertrain options and battery capacities, offering a range of up to 674 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Jeep Compass or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

It's a tie: 4 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmJeep Compass +101 km
    Jeep Compass
    674
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhJeep Compass +19.3 kWh
    Jeep Compass
    96.3
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −2.6 kWh/100 km
    Jeep Compass
    17.8
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +55 PS
    Jeep Compass
    231
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sŠkoda Elroq −1.7 s
    Jeep Compass
    8.3
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Jeep Compass
    180
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWJeep Compass +25 kW
    Jeep Compass
    160
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Jeep Compass
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Weight kgŠkoda Elroq −110 kg
    Jeep Compass
    2160
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lJeep Compass +80 l
    Jeep Compass
    550
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters Jeep Compass
Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range674 km573 kmJeep +101 km
Battery96.3 kWh77 kWhJeep +19.3 kWh
Consumption17.8 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −2.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW135 kWJeep +25 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%28 min 10–80%1 min
Range per minute of charging15 km/min14.3 km/minJeep +0.7 km/min
Voltage400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS286 PSŠkoda +55 PS
0–100 km/h8.3 s6.6 sŠkoda −1.7 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight2160 kg2050 kgŠkoda −110 kg
Boot550 l470 lJeep +80 l
Length4548 mm4488 mmJeep +60 mm
Width1936 mm1884 mmJeep +52 mm
Height1657 mm1625 mmJeep +32 mm
Wheelbase2795 mm2765 mmJeep +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Jeep Compass

Cost per 100 km5.34
Monthly67
Yearly801

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Jeep Compass

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Jeep Compass or Škoda Elroq?

The Jeep Compass goes further: 674 km WLTP against the 573 km of the Škoda Elroq. That is a difference of 101 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Jeep Compass and the Škoda Elroq differ?

The Jeep Compass has FWD and 231 PS. The Škoda Elroq has RWD and 286 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Jeep Compass takes more: 550 l against 470 l in the Škoda Elroq. The difference is 80 l.

Which charges faster?

The Jeep Compass accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.