Jeep Compass vs Peugeot E-3008
Biggest differences: Boot — Jeep Compass 550 l, Peugeot E-3008 588 l · Top speed — Jeep Compass 180 km/h, Peugeot E-3008 170 km/h · 0–100 km/h — Jeep Compass 8.3 s, Peugeot E-3008 8.7 s.
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass is an SUV in the C segment, available with three different powertrain options and battery capacities, offering a range of up to 674 kilometers according to the WLTP cycle.
Peugeot E-3008
The Peugeot E-3008 is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.
Profile against the market: Jeep Compass vs Peugeot E-3008
Jeep CompassLong Range FWD (96,3 kWh)
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Jeep Compass or Peugeot E-3008 — who wins where
Peugeot E-3008 leads 4 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +24 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +0.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmPeugeot E-3008 −0.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSNo difference
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sJeep Compass −0.4 s
- Top speed km/hJeep Compass +10 km/h
- DC charging kWNo difference
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgJeep Compass −6 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +38 l
Technical data: Jeep Compass vs Peugeot E-3008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Jeep Compass Long Range FWD (96,3 kWh) | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 674 km | 698 km | Peugeot +24 km |
| Battery | 96.3 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +0.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.8 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Peugeot −0.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 160 kW | No difference |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 27 min | 27 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 15 km/min | 15.5 km/min | Peugeot +0.5 km/min |
| Voltage | — | 400 V | — |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 231 PS | No difference |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | Jeep −0.4 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h | Jeep +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2160 kg | 2166 kg | Jeep −6 kg |
| Boot | 550 l | 588 l | Peugeot +38 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Peugeot |
| Length | 4548 mm | 4542 mm | Jeep +6 mm |
| Width | 1936 mm | 1895 mm | Jeep +41 mm |
| Height | 1657 mm | 1641 mm | Jeep +16 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2795 mm | 2739 mm | Jeep +56 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Jeep Compass
Peugeot E-3008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Jeep Compass
Peugeot E-3008
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Jeep Compass or Peugeot E-3008?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 674 km of the Jeep Compass. That is a difference of 24 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Peugeot E-3008 — its 96.9 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Jeep Compass, with 96.3 kWh, does not offer it.
Which charges faster?
The Jeep Compass accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Peugeot E-3008 up to 160 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 27 and 27 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Peugeot E-3008 uses less electricity: 17.1 kWh/100 km against 17.8 kWh/100 km in the Jeep Compass. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 105 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.