Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Biggest differences: Weight — Peugeot E-3008 2166 kg, Renault Scenic 1911 kg · 0–100 km/h — Peugeot E-3008 8.7 s, Renault Scenic 7.9 s · Battery — Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh, Renault Scenic 89 kWh.
Peugeot E-3008
Peugeot E-3008 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 497 to 698 km, power from 213 to 325 hp.
Renault Scenic
An electric SUV in the C segment, offering two battery options with a range of up to 642 km according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Renault ScenicLong Range 89 kWh
Peugeot E-3008 or Renault Scenic — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +56 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +7.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmRenault Scenic −0.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot E-3008 +13 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sRenault Scenic −0.8 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWPeugeot E-3008 +10 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgRenault Scenic −255 kg
- Boot lRenault Scenic +25 l
Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Renault Scenic Long Range 89 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 698 km | 642 km | Peugeot +56 km |
| Battery | 96.9 kWh | 89 kWh | Peugeot +7.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 17.1 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km | Renault −0.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 150 kW | Peugeot +10 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 15–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 15.5 km/min | 14.9 km/min | Peugeot +0.6 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 218 PS | Peugeot +13 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.7 s | 7.9 s | Renault −0.8 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 170 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2166 kg | 1911 kg | Renault −255 kg |
| Boot | 520 l | 545 l | Renault +25 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4542 mm | 4470 mm | Peugeot +72 mm |
| Width | 1895 mm | 1864 mm | Peugeot +31 mm |
| Height | 1641 mm | 1571 mm | Peugeot +70 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2739 mm | 2785 mm | Renault +46 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Peugeot E-3008
Renault Scenic
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-3008
Renault Scenic
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-3008 or Renault Scenic?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 642 km of the Renault Scenic. That is a difference of 56 km.
Which charges faster?
The Peugeot E-3008 accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.