Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic

Biggest differences: Weight — Peugeot E-3008 2166 kg, Renault Scenic 1853 kg · WLTP range — Peugeot E-3008 698 km, Renault Scenic 624 km · Battery — Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh, Renault Scenic 87 kWh.

Peugeot E-3008

The Peugeot E-3008 is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different powertrain configurations and battery capacities.

Renault Scenic

The electric SUV in the C-segment offers two drive variants with different battery capacities and motor power.

Profile against the market: Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Peugeot E-3008 or Renault Scenic — who wins where

Peugeot E-3008 leads 5 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +74 km
    Peugeot E-3008
    698
    Renault Scenic
    624
  • Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +9.9 kWh
    Peugeot E-3008
    96.9
    Renault Scenic
    87
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmRenault Scenic −0.2 kWh/100 km
    Peugeot E-3008
    17.1
    Renault Scenic
    16.9
  • Power PSPeugeot E-3008 +11 PS
    Peugeot E-3008
    231
    Renault Scenic
    220
  • 0–100 km/h sRenault Scenic −0.8 s
    Peugeot E-3008
    8.7
    Renault Scenic
    7.9
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Peugeot E-3008
    170
    Renault Scenic
    170
  • DC charging kWPeugeot E-3008 +10 kW
    Peugeot E-3008
    160
    Renault Scenic
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Peugeot E-3008
    11
    Renault Scenic
    11
  • Weight kgRenault Scenic −313 kg
    Peugeot E-3008
    2166
    Renault Scenic
    1853
  • Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +43 l
    Peugeot E-3008
    588
    Renault Scenic
    545

Add a third car

Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Peugeot E-3008 vs Renault Scenic
Key parameters Peugeot E-3008
230 Long Range
Renault Scenic
Long Range 87 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range698 km624 kmPeugeot +74 km
Battery96.9 kWh87 kWhPeugeot +9.9 kWh
Consumption17.1 kWh/100 km16.9 kWh/100 kmRenault −0.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging160 kW150 kWPeugeot +10 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 27 min 20–80%37 min 15–80%10 min
Range per minute of charging15.5 km/min11 km/minPeugeot +4.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS220 PSPeugeot +11 PS
0–100 km/h8.7 s7.9 sRenault −0.8 s
Top speed170 km/h170 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight2166 kg1853 kgRenault −313 kg
Boot588 l545 lPeugeot +43 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4542 mm4470 mmPeugeot +72 mm
Width1895 mm1864 mmPeugeot +31 mm
Height1641 mm1571 mmPeugeot +70 mm
Wheelbase2739 mm2785 mmRenault +46 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Peugeot E-3008

Cost per 100 km5.13
Monthly64
Yearly770

Renault Scenic

Cost per 100 km5.07
Monthly63
Yearly760

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Peugeot E-3008

Renault Scenic

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Peugeot E-3008 or Renault Scenic?

The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 624 km of the Renault Scenic. That is a difference of 74 km.

Which charges faster?

The Peugeot E-3008 accepts up to 160 kW DC, the Renault Scenic up to 150 kW.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.