Nissan Leaf vs Peugeot E-3008
Peugeot E-3008 leads 7 to 3
Biggest differences: Battery — Nissan Leaf 75 kWh, Peugeot E-3008 96.9 kWh · Consumption — Nissan Leaf 13.8 kWh/100 km, Peugeot E-3008 17.1 kWh/100 km · Boot — Nissan Leaf 437 l, Peugeot E-3008 520 l.
Nissan Leaf
The third-generation Nissan Leaf is a C-segment crossover, in model year 2026 in two variants: WLTP range from 451 to 622 km.
Peugeot E-3008
Peugeot E-3008 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 497 to 698 km, power from 213 to 325 hp.
Profile against the market: Nissan Leaf vs Peugeot E-3008
Nissan Leaf75 kWh
Peugeot E-3008230 Long Range
Nissan Leaf or Peugeot E-3008 — who wins where
Peugeot E-3008 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmPeugeot E-3008 +76 km
- Battery kWhPeugeot E-3008 +21.9 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −3.3 kWh/100 km
- Power PSPeugeot E-3008 +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNissan Leaf −1.1 s
- Top speed km/hPeugeot E-3008 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWPeugeot E-3008 +10 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minPeugeot E-3008 −3 min
- Weight ↓ kgNissan Leaf −283 kg
- Boot lPeugeot E-3008 +83 l
Technical data: Nissan Leaf vs Peugeot E-3008
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Nissan Leaf 75 kWh | Peugeot E-3008 230 Long Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 622 km | 698 km | Peugeot +76 km |
| Battery | 75 kWh | 96.9 kWh | Peugeot +21.9 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 13.8 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km | Nissan −3.3 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 150 kW | 160 kW | Peugeot +10 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 20–80% ↓ | 30 min | 27 min | Peugeot −3 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.4 km/min | 15.5 km/min | Peugeot +3.1 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 217 PS | 231 PS | Peugeot +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.6 s | 8.7 s | Nissan −1.1 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 170 km/h | Peugeot +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | FWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1883 kg | 2166 kg | Nissan −283 kg |
| Boot | 437 l | 520 l | Peugeot +83 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4350 mm | 4542 mm | Peugeot +192 mm |
| Width | 1810 mm | 1895 mm | Peugeot +85 mm |
| Height | 1550 mm | 1641 mm | Peugeot +91 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2690 mm | 2739 mm | Peugeot +49 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Nissan Leaf
Peugeot E-3008
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Peugeot E-3008
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Nissan Leafvs
Toyota C-HR+Nissan Leafvs
Kia EV3Nissan Leafvs
Renault Megane E-TechNissan Leafvs
Xpeng L03Nissan LeafvsKia Niro EVNissan Leafvs
Leapmotor B10Nissan Leafvs
MG S5 EVNissan Leafvs
BYD Atto 3Nissan Leafvs
Volkswagen ID.3Nissan Leafvs
Škoda ElroqNissan Leafvs
Lancia GammaPeugeot E-3008vs
Jeep CompassPeugeot E-3008vsRenault ScenicPeugeot E-3008vsŠkoda ElroqPeugeot E-3008vsLancia GammaFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Nissan Leaf or Peugeot E-3008?
The Peugeot E-3008 goes further: 698 km WLTP against the 622 km of the Nissan Leaf. That is a difference of 76 km.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Peugeot E-3008 takes more: 520 l against 437 l in the Nissan Leaf. The difference is 83 l.
Which charges faster?
The Nissan Leaf accepts up to 150 kW DC, the Peugeot E-3008 up to 160 kW. Charging from 20 to 80% takes 30 and 27 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nissan Leaf uses less electricity: 13.8 kWh/100 km against 17.1 kWh/100 km in the Peugeot E-3008. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 495 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.