BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf

BYD Atto 3 leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: DC charging — BYD Atto 3 220 kW, Nissan Leaf 150 kW · Power — BYD Atto 3 313 PS, Nissan Leaf 217 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 3 5.5 s, Nissan Leaf 7.6 s.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.

Nissan Leaf

The third-generation Nissan Leaf is a C-segment crossover, in model year 2026 in two variants: WLTP range from 451 to 622 km.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf — who wins where

BYD Atto 3 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +112 km
    BYD Atto 3
    510
    Nissan Leaf
    622
  • Battery kWhNissan Leaf +0.2 kWh
    BYD Atto 3
    74.8
    Nissan Leaf
    75
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −2.6 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 3
    16.4
    Nissan Leaf
    13.8
  • Power PSBYD Atto 3 +96 PS
    BYD Atto 3
    313
    Nissan Leaf
    217
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Atto 3 −2.1 s
    BYD Atto 3
    5.5
    Nissan Leaf
    7.6
  • Top speed km/hBYD Atto 3 +20 km/h
    BYD Atto 3
    180
    Nissan Leaf
    160
  • DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +70 kW
    BYD Atto 3
    220
    Nissan Leaf
    150
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    11
    Nissan Leaf
    11
  • Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 3 −3 kg
    BYD Atto 3
    1880
    Nissan Leaf
    1883
  • Boot lBYD Atto 3 +53 l
    BYD Atto 3
    490
    Nissan Leaf
    437

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf
Key parameters BYD Atto 3
Design
Nissan Leaf
75 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km622 kmNissan +112 km
Battery74.8 kWh75 kWhNissan +0.2 kWh
Consumption ↓16.4 kWh/100 km13.8 kWh/100 kmNissan −2.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging220 kW150 kWBYD +70 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging ⚠25 min 10–80%30 min 20–80%5 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min12.4 km/minBYD +1.9 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBYD +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power313 PS217 PSBYD +96 PS
0–100 km/h ↓5.5 s7.6 sBYD −2.1 s
Top speed180 km/h160 km/hBYD +20 km/h
DrivetrainRWDFWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓1880 kg1883 kgBYD −3 kg
Boot490 l437 lBYD +53 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4455 mm4350 mmBYD +105 mm
Width1875 mm1810 mmBYD +65 mm
Height1615 mm1550 mmBYD +65 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2690 mmBYD +30 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 3

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Nissan Leaf

Cost per 100 km4.14
Monthly52
Yearly621

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 3

Nissan Leaf

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf?

The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 510 km of the BYD Atto 3. That is a difference of 112 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 3 and the Nissan Leaf differ?

The BYD Atto 3 has RWD and 313 PS. The Nissan Leaf has FWD and 217 PS.

Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf?

The BYD Atto 3 is stronger: 313 PS against the 217 PS of the Nissan Leaf. The gap is 96 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Atto 3 takes more: 490 l against 437 l in the Nissan Leaf. The difference is 53 l.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.