BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf
BYD Atto 3 leads 6 to 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — BYD Atto 3 220 kW, Nissan Leaf 150 kW · Power — BYD Atto 3 313 PS, Nissan Leaf 217 PS · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 3 5.5 s, Nissan Leaf 7.6 s.
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.
Nissan Leaf
The third-generation Nissan Leaf is a C-segment crossover, in model year 2026 in two variants: WLTP range from 451 to 622 km.
Profile against the market: BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf
BYD Atto 3Design
Nissan Leaf75 kWh
BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf — who wins where
BYD Atto 3 leads 6 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +112 km
- Battery kWhNissan Leaf +0.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −2.6 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Atto 3 +96 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Atto 3 −2.1 s
- Top speed km/hBYD Atto 3 +20 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +70 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 3 −3 kg
- Boot lBYD Atto 3 +53 l
Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Nissan Leaf
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BYD Atto 3Design | Nissan Leaf75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 510 km | 622 km | Nissan +112 km |
| Battery | 74.8 kWh | 75 kWh | Nissan +0.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.4 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Nissan −2.6 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 220 kW | 150 kW | BYD +70 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 25 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 5 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 12.4 km/min | BYD +1.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 800 V | 400 V | BYD +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 313 PS | 217 PS | BYD +96 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 5.5 s | 7.6 s | BYD −2.1 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | BYD +20 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1880 kg | 1883 kg | BYD −3 kg |
| Boot | 490 l | 437 l | BYD +53 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4455 mm | 4350 mm | BYD +105 mm |
| Width | 1875 mm | 1810 mm | BYD +65 mm |
| Height | 1615 mm | 1550 mm | BYD +65 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2720 mm | 2690 mm | BYD +30 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BYD Atto 3
Nissan Leaf
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 3
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
BYD Atto 3vs
BMW iX2
BYD Atto 3vs
Renault Megane E-Tech
BYD Atto 3vs
Leapmotor B10
BYD Atto 3vs
Škoda Elroq
BYD Atto 3vs
Lancia Gamma
Nissan Leafvs
Toyota C-HR+
Nissan Leafvs
Kia EV3
Nissan Leafvs
Renault Megane E-Tech
Nissan Leafvs
Xpeng L03
Nissan Leafvs
Kia Niro EV
Nissan Leafvs
Leapmotor B10
Nissan Leafvs
Nissan Leafvs
MG S5 EV
Nissan Leafvs
Volkswagen ID.3
Nissan Leafvs
Škoda Elroq
Nissan Leafvs
Lancia GammaFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf?
The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 510 km of the BYD Atto 3. That is a difference of 112 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BYD Atto 3 and the Nissan Leaf differ?
The BYD Atto 3 has RWD and 313 PS. The Nissan Leaf has FWD and 217 PS.
Which is more powerful — BYD Atto 3 or Nissan Leaf?
The BYD Atto 3 is stronger: 313 PS against the 217 PS of the Nissan Leaf. The gap is 96 PS.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BYD Atto 3 takes more: 490 l against 437 l in the Nissan Leaf. The difference is 53 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.