BMW iX2 vs BYD Atto 3
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX2 130 kW, BYD Atto 3 220 kW · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX2 8.6 s, BYD Atto 3 5.5 s · Power — BMW iX2 204 PS, BYD Atto 3 313 PS.
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two all-electric variants, both boasting a WLTP range exceeding 470 kilometers.
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.
Profile against the market: BMW iX2 vs BYD Atto 3
BMW iX2eDrive20
BYD Atto 3Design
BMW iX2 or BYD Atto 3 — who wins where
BYD Atto 3 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmBMW iX2 +6 km
- Battery kWhBYD Atto 3 +9.6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX2 −2.2 kWh/100 km
- Power PSBYD Atto 3 +109 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sBYD Atto 3 −3.1 s
- Top speed km/hBYD Atto 3 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +90 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minBYD Atto 3 −4 min
- Weight ↓ kgBYD Atto 3 −5 kg
- Boot lBMW iX2 +35 l
Technical data: BMW iX2 vs BYD Atto 3
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | BMW iX2 eDrive20 | BYD Atto 3 Design | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 516 km | 510 km | BMW +6 km |
| Battery | 65.2 kWh | 74.8 kWh | BYD +9.6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.2 kWh/100 km | 16.4 kWh/100 km | BMW −2.2 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 220 kW | BYD +90 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 25 min | BYD −4 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.5 km/min | 14.3 km/min | BYD +1.8 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 800 V | BYD +400 V |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 313 PS | BYD +109 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 5.5 s | BYD −3.1 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | BYD +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1885 kg | 1880 kg | BYD −5 kg |
| Boot | 525 l | 490 l | BMW +35 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only BYD |
| Length | 4554 mm | 4455 mm | BMW +99 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1875 mm | BYD +30 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1615 mm | BYD +55 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2720 mm | BYD +28 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX2
BYD Atto 3
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
BYD Atto 3
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Why does the BYD Atto 3 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX2?
The BYD Atto 3 carries 74.8 kWh and covers 510 km, while the BMW iX2 with its 65.2 kWh battery does 516 km. Energy use decides it: 16.4 against 14.2 kWh/100 km.
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX2 and the BYD Atto 3 differ?
The BMW iX2 has FWD and 204 PS. The BYD Atto 3 has RWD and 313 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the BYD Atto 3 — its 74.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX2, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Which is more powerful — BMW iX2 or BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 is stronger: 313 PS against the 204 PS of the BMW iX2. The gap is 109 PS.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.