BMW iX2 vs Xpeng L03
Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX2 130 kW, Xpeng L03 236 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX2 29 min, Xpeng L03 20 min · Boot — BMW iX2 525 l, Xpeng L03 367 l.
BMW iX2
The BMW iX2 is a crossover in the C segment that offers two all-electric variants, both boasting a WLTP range exceeding 470 kilometers.
Xpeng L03
The Xpeng L03 is a compact SUV available in three different powertrain and battery capacity configurations, offering fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: BMW iX2 vs Xpeng L03
BMW iX2 or Xpeng L03 — who wins where
Xpeng L03 leads 7 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmXpeng L03 +4 km
- Battery kWhXpeng L03 +6 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX2 −1.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSXpeng L03 +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sXpeng L03 −2 s
- Top speed km/hXpeng L03 +10 km/h
- DC charging kWXpeng L03 +106 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng L03 −9 min
- Weight ↓ kgBMW iX2 −55 kg
- Boot lBMW iX2 +158 l
Technical data: BMW iX2 vs Xpeng L03
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters |  BMW iX2eDrive20 |  Xpeng L03Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 516 km | 520 km | Xpeng +4 km |
| Battery | 65.2 kWh | 71.2 kWh | Xpeng +6 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 14.2 kWh/100 km | 16 kWh/100 km | BMW −1.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 130 kW | 236 kW | Xpeng +106 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 29 min | 20 min | Xpeng −9 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12.5 km/min | 18.2 km/min | Xpeng +5.7 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 204 PS | 245 PS | Xpeng +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 8.6 s | 6.6 s | Xpeng −2 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h | Xpeng +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1885 kg | 1940 kg | BMW −55 kg |
| Boot | 525 l | 367 l | BMW +158 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4554 mm | 4650 mm | Xpeng +96 mm |
| Width | 1845 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +75 mm |
| Height | 1560 mm | 1600 mm | Xpeng +40 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2692 mm | 2850 mm | Xpeng +158 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
BMW iX2
Xpeng L03
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Xpeng L03
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover / SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX2 and the Xpeng L03 differ?
The BMW iX2 has FWD and 204 PS. The Xpeng L03 has RWD and 245 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng L03 — its 71.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX2, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The BMW iX2 takes more: 525 l against 367 l in the Xpeng L03. The difference is 158 l.
Which charges faster?
The BMW iX2 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Xpeng L03 up to 236 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 20 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.