Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Elroq 135 kW, Xpeng L03 236 kW · Charging 10–80% — Škoda Elroq 28 min, Xpeng L03 20 min · Boot — Škoda Elroq 470 l, Xpeng L03 367 l.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Xpeng L03
The Xpeng L03 is a compact SUV available in three different powertrain and battery capacity configurations, offering fast DC charging capabilities.
Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03
Škoda Elroq85
Xpeng L03Long Range RWD
Škoda Elroq or Xpeng L03 — who wins where
Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 3
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +53 km
- Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +5.8 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.8 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +41 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sNo difference
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWXpeng L03 +101 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minXpeng L03 −8 min
- Weight ↓ kgXpeng L03 −110 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +103 l
Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Elroq 85 | Xpeng L03 Long Range RWD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 520 km | Škoda +53 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 71.2 kWh | Škoda +5.8 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 16 kWh/100 km | Škoda −0.8 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 135 kW | 236 kW | Xpeng +101 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 20 min | Xpeng −8 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 18.2 km/min | Xpeng +3.9 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 245 PS | Škoda +41 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 6.6 s | No difference |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 1940 kg | Xpeng −110 kg |
| Boot | 470 l | 367 l | Škoda +103 l |
| V2L (external power) | No | Yes | only Xpeng |
| Length | 4488 mm | 4650 mm | Xpeng +162 mm |
| Width | 1884 mm | 1920 mm | Xpeng +36 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1600 mm | Škoda +25 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2765 mm | 2850 mm | Xpeng +85 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Elroq
Xpeng L03
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Xpeng L03
Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Xpeng L03?
The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 520 km of the Xpeng L03. That is a difference of 53 km.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Xpeng L03 — its 71.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 367 l in the Xpeng L03. The difference is 103 l.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Xpeng L03 up to 236 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 20 min respectively.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.