Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03

Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 3

Biggest differences: Charging 10–80% — Škoda Elroq 29 min, Xpeng L03 20 min · DC charging — Škoda Elroq 165 kW, Xpeng L03 236 kW · Boot — Škoda Elroq 470 l, Xpeng L03 367 l.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, available with either RWD or AWD: it offers power outputs ranging from 190 to 340 horsepower, a range of up to 576 km according to the WLTP standard, and DC fast charging capabilities up to 165 kW.

Xpeng L03

Xpeng L03 is a C-segment SUV, in model year 2026 in three variants: WLTP range from 440 to 520 km, power from 222 to 431 hp.

Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

Škoda Elroq or Xpeng L03 — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +56 km
    Škoda Elroq
    576
    Xpeng L03
    520
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +5.8 kWh
    Škoda Elroq
    77
    Xpeng L03
    71.2
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.5 kWh/100 km
    Škoda Elroq
    15.5
    Xpeng L03
    16
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +50 PS
    Škoda Elroq
    299
    Xpeng L03
    249
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.4 s
    Škoda Elroq
    6.2
    Xpeng L03
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    Škoda Elroq
    180
    Xpeng L03
    180
  • DC charging kWXpeng L03 +71 kW
    Škoda Elroq
    165
    Xpeng L03
    236
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    Škoda Elroq
    11
    Xpeng L03
    11
  • Charging ↓ minXpeng L03 −9 min
    Škoda Elroq
    29
    Xpeng L03
    20
  • Weight ↓ kgXpeng L03 −192 kg
    Škoda Elroq
    2132
    Xpeng L03
    1940
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +103 l
    Škoda Elroq
    470
    Xpeng L03
    367

Add a third car

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Xpeng L03
Key parameters Škoda Elroq
85x
Xpeng L03
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range576 km520 kmŠkoda +56 km
Battery77 kWh71.2 kWhŠkoda +5.8 kWh
Consumption ↓15.5 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.5 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging165 kW236 kWXpeng +71 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min20 minXpeng −9 min
Range per minute of charging13.9 km/min18.2 km/minXpeng +4.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power299 PS249 PSŠkoda +50 PS
0–100 km/h ↓6.2 s6.6 sŠkoda −0.4 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainAWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓2132 kg1940 kgXpeng −192 kg
Boot470 l367 lŠkoda +103 l
V2L (external power)YesYes—
Length4488 mm4650 mmXpeng +162 mm
Width1884 mm1920 mmXpeng +36 mm
Height1620 mm1600 mmŠkoda +20 mm
Wheelbase2766 mm2850 mmXpeng +84 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Xpeng L03

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

Škoda Elroq

Xpeng L03

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — Škoda Elroq or Xpeng L03?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 576 km WLTP against the 520 km of the Xpeng L03. That is a difference of 56 km.

How do the drivetrains of the Škoda Elroq and the Xpeng L03 differ?

The Škoda Elroq has AWD and 299 PS. The Xpeng L03 has RWD and 249 PS.

Which has the bigger boot?

The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 367 l in the Xpeng L03. The difference is 103 l.

Which charges faster?

The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 165 kW DC, the Xpeng L03 up to 236 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 20 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.