Škoda Elroq vs Volvo EX40
Biggest differences: DC charging — Škoda Elroq 135 kW, Volvo EX40 200 kW · Boot — Škoda Elroq 470 l, Volvo EX40 410 l · Power — Škoda Elroq 286 PS, Volvo EX40 252 PS.
Škoda Elroq
The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 is a compact crossover available in four different powertrain options, offering a range of up to 574 kilometers and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds.
Profile against the market: Škoda Elroq vs Volvo EX40
Škoda Elroq85
Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range
Škoda Elroq or Volvo EX40 — who wins where
It's a tie: 4 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmVolvo EX40 +1 km
- Battery kWhVolvo EX40 +5 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSŠkoda Elroq +34 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sŠkoda Elroq −0.7 s
- Top speed km/hNo difference
- DC charging kWVolvo EX40 +65 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Charging ↓ minNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX40 −50 kg
- Boot lŠkoda Elroq +60 l
Technical data: Škoda Elroq vs Volvo EX40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Škoda Elroq 85 | Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 573 km | 574 km | Volvo +1 km |
| Battery | 77 kWh | 82 kWh | Volvo +5 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.2 kWh/100 km | 16.6 kWh/100 km | Škoda −1.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 135 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +65 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging 10–80% ↓ | 28 min | 28 min | No difference |
| Range per minute of charging | 14.3 km/min | 14.3 km/min | No difference |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 286 PS | 252 PS | Škoda +34 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.6 s | 7.3 s | Škoda −0.7 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 180 km/h | No difference |
| Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | — |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2050 kg | 2000 kg | Volvo −50 kg |
| Boot | 470 l | 410 l | Škoda +60 l |
| Length | 4488 mm | 4440 mm | Škoda +48 mm |
| Width | 1884 mm | 1873 mm | Škoda +11 mm |
| Height | 1625 mm | 1647 mm | Volvo +22 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2765 mm | 2702 mm | Škoda +63 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Škoda Elroq
Volvo EX40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Škoda Elroq
Volvo EX40
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the bigger boot?
The Škoda Elroq takes more: 470 l against 410 l in the Volvo EX40. The difference is 60 l.
Which charges faster?
The Škoda Elroq accepts up to 135 kW DC, the Volvo EX40 up to 200 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Škoda Elroq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 16.6 kWh/100 km in the Volvo EX40. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 210 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.