Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EX40
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Biggest differences: AC charging — Lancia Gamma 7 kW, Volvo EX40 11 kW · Boot — Lancia Gamma 560 l, Volvo EX40 410 l · WLTP range — Lancia Gamma 741 km, Volvo EX40 574 km.
Lancia Gamma
The Lancia Gamma is an all-electric crossover in the C segment, available in three versions: with a WLTP range of 543 to 741 km, power ranging from 230 to 350 horsepower, and DC fast charging at 160 kW.
Volvo EX40
The Volvo EX40 is a compact crossover available in four different powertrain options, offering a range of up to 574 kilometers and accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds.
Profile against the market: Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EX40
Lancia GammaLong Range
Volvo EX40Single Motor Extended Range
Lancia Gamma or Volvo EX40 — who wins where
It's a tie: 5 to 5
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmLancia Gamma +167 km
- Battery kWhLancia Gamma +15.2 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmLancia Gamma −0.4 kWh/100 km
- Power PSVolvo EX40 +7 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sVolvo EX40 −0.5 s
- Top speed km/hLancia Gamma +10 km/h
- DC charging kWVolvo EX40 +40 kW
- AC charging kWVolvo EX40 +4 kW
- Weight ↓ kgVolvo EX40 −135 kg
- Boot lLancia Gamma +150 l
Technical data: Lancia Gamma vs Volvo EX40
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | Lancia Gamma Long Range | Volvo EX40 Single Motor Extended Range | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 741 km | 574 km | Lancia +167 km |
| Battery | 97.2 kWh | 82 kWh | Lancia +15.2 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 16.2 kWh/100 km | 16.6 kWh/100 km | Lancia −0.4 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 160 kW | 200 kW | Volvo +40 kW |
| AC charging | 7 kW | 11 kW | Volvo +4 kW |
| Charging ⚠ | 27 min 20–80% | 28 min 10–80% | 1 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 16.5 km/min | 14.3 km/min | Lancia +2.2 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 245 PS | 252 PS | Volvo +7 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 7.8 s | 7.3 s | Volvo −0.5 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 180 km/h | Lancia +10 km/h |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 2135 kg | 2000 kg | Volvo −135 kg |
| Boot | 560 l | 410 l | Lancia +150 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | No | only Lancia |
| Length | 4672 mm | 4440 mm | Lancia +232 mm |
| Width | 1898 mm | 1873 mm | Lancia +25 mm |
| Height | 1664 mm | 1647 mm | Lancia +17 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2791 mm | 2702 mm | Lancia +89 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
Lancia Gamma
Volvo EX40
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Lancia Gamma
Volvo EX40
Other comparisons in this class: Crossover, segment C
Frequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — Lancia Gamma or Volvo EX40?
The Lancia Gamma goes further: 741 km WLTP against the 574 km of the Volvo EX40. That is a difference of 167 km.
How do the drivetrains of the Lancia Gamma and the Volvo EX40 differ?
The Lancia Gamma has FWD and 245 PS. The Volvo EX40 has RWD and 252 PS.
Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?
Only the Lancia Gamma — its 97.2 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Volvo EX40, with 82 kWh, does not offer it.
Which has the bigger boot?
The Lancia Gamma takes more: 560 l against 410 l in the Volvo EX40. The difference is 150 l.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.