BYD Atto 3 vs Xpeng L03

Biggest differences: Boot — BYD Atto 3 490 l, Xpeng L03 367 l · Power — BYD Atto 3 313 PS, Xpeng L03 245 PS · Charging 10–80% — BYD Atto 3 25 min, Xpeng L03 20 min.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.

Xpeng L03

The Xpeng L03 is a compact SUV available in three different powertrain and battery capacity configurations, offering fast DC charging capabilities.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 3 vs Xpeng L03

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 3 or Xpeng L03 — who wins where

BYD Atto 3 leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmXpeng L03 +10 km
    BYD Atto 3
    510
    Xpeng L03
    520
  • Battery kWhBYD Atto 3 +3.6 kWh
    BYD Atto 3
    74.8
    Xpeng L03
    71.2
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmXpeng L03 −0.4 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 3
    16.4
    Xpeng L03
    16
  • Power PSBYD Atto 3 +68 PS
    BYD Atto 3
    313
    Xpeng L03
    245
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Atto 3 −1.1 s
    BYD Atto 3
    5.5
    Xpeng L03
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    180
    Xpeng L03
    180
  • DC charging kWXpeng L03 +16 kW
    BYD Atto 3
    220
    Xpeng L03
    236
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    11
    Xpeng L03
    11
  • Charging minXpeng L03 −5 min
    BYD Atto 3
    25
    Xpeng L03
    20
  • Weight kgBYD Atto 3 −60 kg
    BYD Atto 3
    1880
    Xpeng L03
    1940
  • Boot lBYD Atto 3 +123 l
    BYD Atto 3
    490
    Xpeng L03
    367

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Xpeng L03

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Xpeng L03
Key parameters BYD Atto 3
Design
Xpeng L03
Long Range RWD
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km520 kmXpeng +10 km
Battery74.8 kWh71.2 kWhBYD +3.6 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmXpeng −0.4 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging220 kW236 kWXpeng +16 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%25 min20 minXpeng −5 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min18.2 km/minXpeng +3.9 km/min
Voltage800 V400 VBYD +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power313 PS245 PSBYD +68 PS
0–100 km/h5.5 s6.6 sBYD −1.1 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1880 kg1940 kgBYD −60 kg
Boot490 l367 lBYD +123 l
V2L (external power)YesYes
Length4455 mm4650 mmXpeng +195 mm
Width1875 mm1920 mmXpeng +45 mm
Height1615 mm1600 mmBYD +15 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2850 mmXpeng +130 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 3

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Xpeng L03

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 3

Xpeng L03

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the BYD Atto 3 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the Xpeng L03?

The BYD Atto 3 carries 74.8 kWh and covers 510 km, while the Xpeng L03 with its 71.2 kWh battery does 520 km. Energy use decides it: 16.4 against 16 kWh/100 km.

Which has the bigger boot?

The BYD Atto 3 takes more: 490 l against 367 l in the Xpeng L03. The difference is 123 l.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Atto 3 accepts up to 220 kW DC, the Xpeng L03 up to 236 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 20 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Xpeng L03 uses less electricity: 16 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the BYD Atto 3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 60 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.