BYD Atto 3 vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: DC charging — BYD Atto 3 220 kW, Škoda Elroq 135 kW · 0–100 km/h — BYD Atto 3 5.5 s, Škoda Elroq 6.6 s · WLTP range — BYD Atto 3 510 km, Škoda Elroq 573 km.

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an SUV in the C segment, offering three different configurations of power output and range according to the WLTP standard.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: BYD Atto 3 vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BYD Atto 3 or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

BYD Atto 3 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +63 km
    BYD Atto 3
    510
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +2.2 kWh
    BYD Atto 3
    74.8
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −1.2 kWh/100 km
    BYD Atto 3
    16.4
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSBYD Atto 3 +27 PS
    BYD Atto 3
    313
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sBYD Atto 3 −1.1 s
    BYD Atto 3
    5.5
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    180
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWBYD Atto 3 +85 kW
    BYD Atto 3
    220
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BYD Atto 3
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Charging minBYD Atto 3 −3 min
    BYD Atto 3
    25
    Škoda Elroq
    28
  • Weight kgBYD Atto 3 −170 kg
    BYD Atto 3
    1880
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lBYD Atto 3 +20 l
    BYD Atto 3
    490
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BYD Atto 3 vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters BYD Atto 3
Design
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range510 km573 kmŠkoda +63 km
Battery74.8 kWh77 kWhŠkoda +2.2 kWh
Consumption16.4 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −1.2 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging220 kW135 kWBYD +85 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%25 min28 minBYD −3 min
Range per minute of charging14.3 km/min14.3 km/minNo difference
Voltage800 V400 VBYD +400 V
Performance and drivetrain
Power313 PS286 PSBYD +27 PS
0–100 km/h5.5 s6.6 sBYD −1.1 s
Top speed180 km/h180 km/hNo difference
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1880 kg2050 kgBYD −170 kg
Boot490 l470 lBYD +20 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly BYD
Length4455 mm4488 mmŠkoda +33 mm
Width1875 mm1884 mmŠkoda +9 mm
Height1615 mm1625 mmŠkoda +10 mm
Wheelbase2720 mm2765 mmŠkoda +45 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BYD Atto 3

Cost per 100 km4.92
Monthly61
Yearly738

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BYD Atto 3

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BYD Atto 3 or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 510 km of the BYD Atto 3. That is a difference of 63 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the BYD Atto 3 — its 74.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The BYD Atto 3 accepts up to 220 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 25 and 28 min respectively.

Which is cheaper to run?

The Škoda Elroq uses less electricity: 15.2 kWh/100 km against 16.4 kWh/100 km in the BYD Atto 3. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 180 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.