MG S5 EV vs Nissan Leaf
MG S5 EV leads 5 to 4
Biggest differences: WLTP range — MG S5 EV 480 km, Nissan Leaf 622 km · 0–100 km/h — MG S5 EV 6.3 s, Nissan Leaf 7.6 s · Top speed — MG S5 EV 190 km/h, Nissan Leaf 160 km/h.
MG S5 EV
The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.
Nissan Leaf
The third-generation Nissan Leaf is a C-segment crossover, in model year 2026 in two variants: WLTP range from 451 to 622 km.
Profile against the market: MG S5 EV vs Nissan Leaf
MG S5 EVLong Range
Nissan Leaf75 kWh
MG S5 EV or Nissan Leaf — who wins where
MG S5 EV leads 5 to 4
Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.
- WLTP range kmNissan Leaf +142 km
- Battery kWhNissan Leaf +11 kWh
- Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmNissan Leaf −1.7 kWh/100 km
- Power PSMG S5 EV +14 PS
- 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG S5 EV −1.3 s
- Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +30 km/h
- DC charging kWNissan Leaf +11 kW
- AC charging kWNo difference
- Weight ↓ kgMG S5 EV −203 kg
- Boot lMG S5 EV +16 l
Technical data: MG S5 EV vs Nissan Leaf
Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data
| Key parameters | MG S5 EVLong Range | Nissan Leaf75 kWh | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range and energy | |||
| WLTP range | 480 km | 622 km | Nissan +142 km |
| Battery | 64 kWh | 75 kWh | Nissan +11 kWh |
| Consumption ↓ | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 13.8 kWh/100 km | Nissan −1.7 kWh/100 km |
| Charging | |||
| DC charging | 139 kW | 150 kW | Nissan +11 kW |
| AC charging | 11 kW | 11 kW | No difference |
| Charging ⚠ | 28 min 10–80% | 30 min 20–80% | 2 min |
| Range per minute of charging | 12 km/min | 12.4 km/min | Nissan +0.4 km/min |
| Voltage | 400 V | 400 V | No difference |
| Performance and drivetrain | |||
| Power | 231 PS | 217 PS | MG +14 PS |
| 0–100 km/h ↓ | 6.3 s | 7.6 s | MG −1.3 s |
| Top speed | 190 km/h | 160 km/h | MG +30 km/h |
| Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | different type |
| Practicality | |||
| Weight ↓ | 1680 kg | 1883 kg | MG −203 kg |
| Boot | 453 l | 437 l | MG +16 l |
| V2L (external power) | Yes | Yes | — |
| Length | 4476 mm | 4350 mm | MG +126 mm |
| Width | 1849 mm | 1810 mm | MG +39 mm |
| Height | 1621 mm | 1550 mm | MG +71 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2730 mm | 2690 mm | MG +40 mm |
The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.
Energy cost calculator
MG S5 EV
Nissan Leaf
Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.
Video reviews of both models
Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C
MG S5 EVvs
BMW iX1
MG S5 EVvs
Renault Megane E-Tech
MG S5 EVvs
Škoda Elroq
MG S5 EVvs
Lancia Gamma
Nissan Leafvs
Toyota C-HR+
Nissan Leafvs
Kia EV3
Nissan Leafvs
Renault Megane E-Tech
Nissan Leafvs
Xpeng L03
Nissan Leafvs
Kia Niro EV
Nissan Leafvs
Leapmotor B10
Nissan Leafvs
Nissan Leafvs
BYD Atto 3
Nissan Leafvs
Volkswagen ID.3
Nissan Leafvs
Škoda Elroq
Nissan Leafvs
Lancia GammaFrequently asked questions about this comparison
Which has the longer range — MG S5 EV or Nissan Leaf?
The Nissan Leaf goes further: 622 km WLTP against the 480 km of the MG S5 EV. That is a difference of 142 km.
How do the drivetrains of the MG S5 EV and the Nissan Leaf differ?
The MG S5 EV has RWD and 231 PS. The Nissan Leaf has FWD and 217 PS.
Which charges faster?
The MG S5 EV accepts up to 139 kW DC, the Nissan Leaf up to 150 kW.
Which is cheaper to run?
The Nissan Leaf uses less electricity: 13.8 kWh/100 km against 15.5 kWh/100 km in the MG S5 EV. Over 15000 km a year that is a difference of 255 kWh — the calculator on this page turns it into money.
Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer
Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.