MG S5 EV vs Škoda Elroq

Biggest differences: Power — MG S5 EV 231 PS, Škoda Elroq 286 PS · Weight — MG S5 EV 1680 kg, Škoda Elroq 2050 kg · Battery — MG S5 EV 64 kWh, Škoda Elroq 77 kWh.

MG S5 EV

The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.

Škoda Elroq

The Škoda Elroq is a compact SUV in the C-segment, offering rear-wheel drive or all-wheel drive options, and power outputs ranging from 170 to 340 horsepower.

Profile against the market: MG S5 EV vs Škoda Elroq

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

MG S5 EV or Škoda Elroq — who wins where

Škoda Elroq leads 5 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmŠkoda Elroq +93 km
    MG S5 EV
    480
    Škoda Elroq
    573
  • Battery kWhŠkoda Elroq +13 kWh
    MG S5 EV
    64
    Škoda Elroq
    77
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmŠkoda Elroq −0.3 kWh/100 km
    MG S5 EV
    15.5
    Škoda Elroq
    15.2
  • Power PSŠkoda Elroq +55 PS
    MG S5 EV
    231
    Škoda Elroq
    286
  • 0–100 km/h sMG S5 EV −0.3 s
    MG S5 EV
    6.3
    Škoda Elroq
    6.6
  • Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +10 km/h
    MG S5 EV
    190
    Škoda Elroq
    180
  • DC charging kWMG S5 EV +4 kW
    MG S5 EV
    139
    Škoda Elroq
    135
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    MG S5 EV
    11
    Škoda Elroq
    11
  • Charging minNo difference
    MG S5 EV
    28
    Škoda Elroq
    28
  • Weight kgMG S5 EV −370 kg
    MG S5 EV
    1680
    Škoda Elroq
    2050
  • Boot lŠkoda Elroq +17 l
    MG S5 EV
    453
    Škoda Elroq
    470

Add a third car

Technical data: MG S5 EV vs Škoda Elroq

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: MG S5 EV vs Škoda Elroq
Key parameters MG S5 EV
Long Range
Škoda Elroq
85
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range480 km573 kmŠkoda +93 km
Battery64 kWh77 kWhŠkoda +13 kWh
Consumption15.5 kWh/100 km15.2 kWh/100 kmŠkoda −0.3 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging139 kW135 kWMG +4 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%28 min28 minNo difference
Range per minute of charging12 km/min14.3 km/minŠkoda +2.3 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power231 PS286 PSŠkoda +55 PS
0–100 km/h6.3 s6.6 sMG −0.3 s
Top speed190 km/h180 km/hMG +10 km/h
DrivetrainRWDRWD
Practicality
Weight1680 kg2050 kgMG −370 kg
Boot453 l470 lŠkoda +17 l
V2L (external power)YesNoonly MG
Length4476 mm4488 mmŠkoda +12 mm
Width1849 mm1884 mmŠkoda +35 mm
Height1621 mm1625 mmŠkoda +4 mm
Wheelbase2730 mm2765 mmŠkoda +35 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

MG S5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Škoda Elroq

Cost per 100 km4.56
Monthly57
Yearly684

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

MG S5 EV

Škoda Elroq

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — MG S5 EV or Škoda Elroq?

The Škoda Elroq goes further: 573 km WLTP against the 480 km of the MG S5 EV. That is a difference of 93 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG S5 EV — its 64 kWh battery then works as a power source. The Škoda Elroq, with 77 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The MG S5 EV accepts up to 139 kW DC, the Škoda Elroq up to 135 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 28 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.