BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

MG S5 EV leads 5 to 4

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BMW iX1 8.6 s, MG S5 EV 6.3 s · Consumption — BMW iX1 12.6 kWh/100 km, MG S5 EV 15.5 kWh/100 km · Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, MG S5 EV 231 PS.

BMW iX1

BMW iX1 is a C-segment SUV in two variants: the eDrive20 with a WLTP range of 516 km and the xDrive30 with 306 hp.

MG S5 EV

The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or MG S5 EV — who wins where

MG S5 EV leads 5 to 4

The score leaves out metrics where data is missing on one side.

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX1 +36 km
    BMW iX1
    516
    MG S5 EV
    480
  • Battery kWhBMW iX1 +1.2 kWh
    BMW iX1
    65.2
    MG S5 EV
    64
  • Consumption ↓ kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −2.9 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    12.6
    MG S5 EV
    15.5
  • Power PSMG S5 EV +27 PS
    BMW iX1
    204
    MG S5 EV
    231
  • 0–100 km/h ↓ sMG S5 EV −2.3 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    MG S5 EV
    6.3
  • Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +20 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    MG S5 EV
    190
  • DC charging kWMG S5 EV +9 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    MG S5 EV
    139
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX1
    11
    MG S5 EV
    11
  • Charging ↓ minMG S5 EV −1 min
    BMW iX1
    29
    MG S5 EV
    28
  • Weight ↓ kgNo data
    BMW iX1
    —
    MG S5 EV
    1680
  • Boot lBMW iX1 +37 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    MG S5 EV
    453

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20 · 2026 model year
MG S5 EV
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range516 km480 kmBMW +36 km
Battery65.2 kWh64 kWhBMW +1.2 kWh
Consumption ↓12.6 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmBMW −2.9 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW139 kWMG +9 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80% ↓29 min28 minMG −1 min
Range per minute of charging12.5 km/min12 km/minBMW +0.5 km/min
Voltage—400 V—
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS231 PSMG +27 PS
0–100 km/h ↓8.6 s6.3 sMG −2.3 s
Top speed170 km/h190 km/hMG +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight ↓—1680 kg—
Boot490 l453 lBMW +37 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length—4476 mm—
Width—1849 mm—
Height—1621 mm—
Wheelbase—2730 mm—

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km3.78
Monthly47
Yearly567

MG S5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

MG S5 EV

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or MG S5 EV?

The BMW iX1 goes further: 516 km WLTP against the 480 km of the MG S5 EV. That is a difference of 36 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the MG S5 EV differ?

The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The MG S5 EV has RWD and 231 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG S5 EV — its 64 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 65.2 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX1 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the MG S5 EV up to 139 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.