BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

Biggest differences: 0–100 km/h — BMW iX1 8.6 s, MG S5 EV 6.3 s · Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, MG S5 EV 231 PS · Top speed — BMW iX1 170 km/h, MG S5 EV 190 km/h.

BMW iX1

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric SUV that offers two power options and can be configured with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.

MG S5 EV

The MG S5 EV is an all-electric SUV in the C segment, offering two rear-wheel drive (RWD) variants with different battery capacities and motor power outputs.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or MG S5 EV — who wins where

MG S5 EV leads 7 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmMG S5 EV +5 km
    BMW iX1
    475
    MG S5 EV
    480
  • Battery kWhBMW iX1 +0.7 kWh
    BMW iX1
    64.7
    MG S5 EV
    64
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −0.1 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    15.4
    MG S5 EV
    15.5
  • Power PSMG S5 EV +27 PS
    BMW iX1
    204
    MG S5 EV
    231
  • 0–100 km/h sMG S5 EV −2.3 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    MG S5 EV
    6.3
  • Top speed km/hMG S5 EV +20 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    MG S5 EV
    190
  • DC charging kWMG S5 EV +9 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    MG S5 EV
    139
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX1
    11
    MG S5 EV
    11
  • Charging minMG S5 EV −1 min
    BMW iX1
    29
    MG S5 EV
    28
  • Weight kgMG S5 EV −185 kg
    BMW iX1
    1865
    MG S5 EV
    1680
  • Boot lBMW iX1 +37 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    MG S5 EV
    453

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs MG S5 EV
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20
MG S5 EV
Long Range
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km480 kmMG +5 km
Battery64.7 kWh64 kWhBMW +0.7 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km15.5 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.1 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW139 kWMG +9 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%29 min28 minMG −1 min
Range per minute of charging11.5 km/min12 km/minMG +0.5 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS231 PSMG +27 PS
0–100 km/h8.6 s6.3 sMG −2.3 s
Top speed170 km/h190 km/hMG +20 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1865 kg1680 kgMG −185 kg
Boot490 l453 lBMW +37 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly MG
Length4500 mm4476 mmBMW +24 mm
Width1845 mm1849 mmMG +4 mm
Height1616 mm1621 mmMG +5 mm
Wheelbase2692 mm2730 mmMG +38 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

MG S5 EV

Cost per 100 km4.65
Monthly58
Yearly697

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

MG S5 EV

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Why does the BMW iX1 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the MG S5 EV?

The BMW iX1 carries 64.7 kWh and covers 475 km, while the MG S5 EV with its 64 kWh battery does 480 km. Energy use decides it: 15.4 against 15.5 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the MG S5 EV differ?

The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The MG S5 EV has RWD and 231 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the MG S5 EV — its 64 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 64.7 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX1 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the MG S5 EV up to 139 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 28 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.