BMW iX1 vs Smart #3

Biggest differences: AC charging — BMW iX1 11 kW, Smart #3 22 kW · 0–100 km/h — BMW iX1 8.6 s, Smart #3 5.8 s · Power — BMW iX1 204 PS, Smart #3 272 PS.

BMW iX1

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric SUV that offers two power options and can be configured with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.

Smart #3

The Smart #3 is an electric SUV in the C segment, offering three different drive configurations and battery capacities.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Smart #3

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or Smart #3 — who wins where

Smart #3 leads 7 to 4

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX1 +20 km
    BMW iX1
    475
    Smart #3
    455
  • Battery kWhSmart #3 +1.3 kWh
    BMW iX1
    64.7
    Smart #3
    66
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −0.6 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    15.4
    Smart #3
    16
  • Power PSSmart #3 +68 PS
    BMW iX1
    204
    Smart #3
    272
  • 0–100 km/h sSmart #3 −2.8 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    Smart #3
    5.8
  • Top speed km/hSmart #3 +10 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    Smart #3
    180
  • DC charging kWSmart #3 +20 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    Smart #3
    150
  • AC charging kWSmart #3 +11 kW
    BMW iX1
    11
    Smart #3
    22
  • Charging minBMW iX1 −1 min
    BMW iX1
    29
    Smart #3
    30
  • Weight kgSmart #3 −85 kg
    BMW iX1
    1865
    Smart #3
    1780
  • Boot lBMW iX1 +120 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    Smart #3
    370

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Smart #3

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Smart #3
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20
Smart #3
Pro+
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km455 kmBMW +20 km
Battery64.7 kWh66 kWhSmart +1.3 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km16 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.6 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW150 kWSmart +20 kW
AC charging11 kW22 kWSmart +11 kW
Charging 10–80%29 min30 minBMW −1 min
Range per minute of charging11.5 km/min10.6 km/minBMW +0.9 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS272 PSSmart +68 PS
0–100 km/h8.6 s5.8 sSmart −2.8 s
Top speed170 km/h180 km/hSmart +10 km/h
DrivetrainFWDRWDdifferent type
Practicality
Weight1865 kg1780 kgSmart −85 kg
Boot490 l370 lBMW +120 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Smart
Length4500 mm4400 mmBMW +100 mm
Width1845 mm1844 mmBMW +1 mm
Height1616 mm1556 mmBMW +60 mm
Wheelbase2692 mm2785 mmSmart +93 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Smart #3

Cost per 100 km4.8
Monthly60
Yearly720

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

Smart #3

Other comparisons in this class: SUV, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Smart #3?

The BMW iX1 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 455 km of the Smart #3. That is a difference of 20 km.

Why does the Smart #3 have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX1?

The Smart #3 carries 66 kWh and covers 455 km, while the BMW iX1 with its 64.7 kWh battery does 475 km. Energy use decides it: 16 against 15.4 kWh/100 km.

How do the drivetrains of the BMW iX1 and the Smart #3 differ?

The BMW iX1 has FWD and 204 PS. The Smart #3 has RWD and 272 PS.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Smart #3 — its 66 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 64.7 kWh, does not offer it.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.