BMW iX1 vs Kia Niro EV

Biggest differences: DC charging — BMW iX1 130 kW, Kia Niro EV 80 kW · Charging 10–80% — BMW iX1 29 min, Kia Niro EV 43 min · Weight — BMW iX1 1865 kg, Kia Niro EV 1610 kg.

BMW iX1

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric SUV that offers two power options and can be configured with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive.

Kia Niro EV

The Kia Niro EV is an electric crossover in the C-segment, offering front-wheel drive and a range of up to 460 km according to the WLTP cycle.

Profile against the market: BMW iX1 vs Kia Niro EV

WLTP rangeBatteryPowerDC charging0–100 km/h

BMW iX1 or Kia Niro EV — who wins where

BMW iX1 leads 6 to 3

Click a slice to see only those metrics. Each bar shows where the car stands against the whole catalogue.

  • WLTP range kmBMW iX1 +15 km
    BMW iX1
    475
    Kia Niro EV
    460
  • Battery kWhKia Niro EV +0.1 kWh
    BMW iX1
    64.7
    Kia Niro EV
    64.8
  • Consumption kWh/100 kmBMW iX1 −0.8 kWh/100 km
    BMW iX1
    15.4
    Kia Niro EV
    16.2
  • Power PSNo difference
    BMW iX1
    204
    Kia Niro EV
    204
  • 0–100 km/h sKia Niro EV −0.8 s
    BMW iX1
    8.6
    Kia Niro EV
    7.8
  • Top speed km/hBMW iX1 +3 km/h
    BMW iX1
    170
    Kia Niro EV
    167
  • DC charging kWBMW iX1 +50 kW
    BMW iX1
    130
    Kia Niro EV
    80
  • AC charging kWNo difference
    BMW iX1
    11
    Kia Niro EV
    11
  • Charging minBMW iX1 −14 min
    BMW iX1
    29
    Kia Niro EV
    43
  • Weight kgKia Niro EV −255 kg
    BMW iX1
    1865
    Kia Niro EV
    1610
  • Boot lBMW iX1 +15 l
    BMW iX1
    490
    Kia Niro EV
    475

Add a third car

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Kia Niro EV

Bold and underline = better value · ↓ = lower is better · — = no data

Technical data: BMW iX1 vs Kia Niro EV
Key parameters BMW iX1
eDrive20
Kia Niro EV
64.8 kWh
Difference
Range and energy
WLTP range475 km460 kmBMW +15 km
Battery64.7 kWh64.8 kWhKia +0.1 kWh
Consumption15.4 kWh/100 km16.2 kWh/100 kmBMW −0.8 kWh/100 km
Charging
DC charging130 kW80 kWBMW +50 kW
AC charging11 kW11 kWNo difference
Charging 10–80%29 min43 minBMW −14 min
Range per minute of charging11.5 km/min7.5 km/minBMW +4 km/min
Voltage400 V400 VNo difference
Performance and drivetrain
Power204 PS204 PSNo difference
0–100 km/h8.6 s7.8 sKia −0.8 s
Top speed170 km/h167 km/hBMW +3 km/h
DrivetrainFWDFWD
Practicality
Weight1865 kg1610 kgKia −255 kg
Boot490 l475 lBMW +15 l
V2L (external power)NoYesonly Kia
Length4500 mm4420 mmBMW +80 mm
Width1845 mm1825 mmBMW +20 mm
Height1616 mm1570 mmBMW +46 mm
Wheelbase2692 mm2720 mmKia +28 mm

The better value in each row is bold and underlined in the colour of the car. Metrics marked ↓ — lower is better. Dimensions are shown without picking a winner.

Energy cost calculator

BMW iX1

Cost per 100 km4.62
Monthly58
Yearly693

Kia Niro EV

Cost per 100 km4.86
Monthly61
Yearly729

Amounts are in your currency — enter prices in the currency you use.

Video reviews of both models

BMW iX1

Kia Niro EV

Other comparisons in this class: SUV / Crossover, segment C

Frequently asked questions about this comparison

Which has the longer range — BMW iX1 or Kia Niro EV?

The BMW iX1 goes further: 475 km WLTP against the 460 km of the Kia Niro EV. That is a difference of 15 km.

Why does the Kia Niro EV have a bigger battery but a shorter range than the BMW iX1?

The Kia Niro EV carries 64.8 kWh and covers 460 km, while the BMW iX1 with its 64.7 kWh battery does 475 km. Energy use decides it: 16.2 against 15.4 kWh/100 km.

Which one can power appliances from a socket (V2L)?

Only the Kia Niro EV — its 64.8 kWh battery then works as a power source. The BMW iX1, with 64.7 kWh, does not offer it.

Which charges faster?

The BMW iX1 accepts up to 130 kW DC, the Kia Niro EV up to 80 kW. Charging from 10 to 80% takes 29 and 43 min respectively.

Technical data comes from official manufacturer materials and we do our best to verify it, but a manufacturer can change a specification without notice and mistakes do happen. Confirm the figures with a dealer before you buy — we accept no liability for decisions made on the basis of this data. Full disclaimer

Range, consumption and weight are given for the base configuration: manufacturers homologate them as a band of values that depends on wheels and equipment (e.g. 533–592 km), and we take the lightest variant, on the smallest wheels — i.e. the most favourable. The same model on larger wheels will travel a shorter distance.